Well, I like learning something new. Other signs make it look like an APU but I just find those NICs odd.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts Menu$ sudo sockstat -4l
It might not be listening on 3000 and you forgot what you set it to :)Quote from: bugleboy on May 20, 2025, 05:54:48 PMBest to read the thread. Especially post #15 applies to your question. Even better if you create your own thread.QuoteI have read a lot on the previous issues that have popped up with this controller since it was baked into FreeBSD and I have been researching kernel tunables to try and increase throughput. I have noticed in my pursuit that it seems like opnsense is not loading the igc driver. When I run kldstat, I am not seeing a module loaded for the card but somehow the card is still identified:
When I run 'pciconf -a igc0', it only shows that it is attached and no driver information. Am I missing something here? I know that the freebsd man page for IGC4 says that the driver was not implemented until 14.0, but how is this card working under freebsd 13.2 base? The reason I am asking about this is that I found a driver pack that references the I225-V card that was updated on 12/23/2023 here (https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/download/15084/intel-ethernet-adapter-complete-driver-pack.html) and was wondering if maybe this could be helpful to alleviate the rampant issues with this controller. Other reason that I am curious is because I found this paper "Tuning FreeBSD for routing and firewalling" (https://papers.freebsd.org/2018/asiabsdcon/cochard-tuning_freebsd_for_routing_and_firewalling.files/cochard-tuning_freebsd_for_routing_and_firewalling-paper.pdf referenced in another post under this forum and it makes mention of setting the receive process limit to unlimited on Intel controllers; however, 'sysctl -a | grep rx_process_limit' only returns an oid of "hw.vtnet.rx_process_limit: 1024".
Am I missing something on this whole thing?
I'm having this exact issue. Did you ever find a fix to this?
Quote from: MicN on May 21, 2025, 01:54:20 AMThanks for that. I'm glad to hear I've not gone mad just yet.Quote from: cookiemonster on May 21, 2025, 12:50:50 AMWell maybe wrongly but I assumed that HA on OPN was possible for a single WAN. The docs https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/how-tos/carp.html show all IPs used for the HA setup are non-routable and show a single WAN link at the front of the router/switch.
So clearly it needs a router to route from WAN to LAN(s)/VIPs but I admit having revisited now, I'm unclear.
There's a thread here that has a bunch of folks trying/working on it (and a git repo with a few forks) using scripts to overcome the need for CARP on the WAN interface when only a single DHCP IP is available there (such as a home internet connection) - essentially you copy the WAN mac of the primary to the secondary and leave that interface shutdown. When a CARP failover is triggered, the interface is brought up and the same DHCP lease is still valid. There'd still need to be an ARP on the broadcast domain to update the forwarding tables in the local switch (/bridge in the case of a VM) for the new port, but there'd still be minimal impact.