Quote from: Patrick M. Hausen on October 29, 2024, 07:13:48 pm64 bits is not nearly enough for route aggregation and hierarchies.I dare you to demonstrate that.If you are not a software developer, it is hard to appreciate the true magnitude of a 64-bit number.It gives you another whole range of IPv4 on top of itself. There is no way in hell this is not enough.
64 bits is not nearly enough for route aggregation and hierarchies.
Can we summarize the discussion: ipv6 is perfect, just the users are to dull to realize it?
https://www.heise.de/news/APNIC-Chefwissenschaftler-IPv6-Einfuehrung-wohl-obsolet-9995140.html
I'd be very interested in a good long post about all the stuff that needs to be studied, maybe I can find a way around my CGNAT ISP, if they are doing IPv6 correctly. I think they are still handing out local addresses, but having a static internet routable address would be really nice.
ULA is useless in actual deployments.
Auja! Wir verlinken hier die schönsten Kommentare vom Heise-Forum! Dafür sollten wir ein eigens Board einrichten! :-D
Also Ivan Pepelnjak's blog is great, although you have to search a bit for IPv6 related things. Ivan is one of the most prominent people making the case that ULA is useless in actual deployments.https://www.ipspace.net/Main_PageHTH,Patrick