1
22.1 Legacy Series / Re: Top Talkers old features
« on: January 31, 2022, 05:54:21 pm »
Will do! I just wanted to unformally check here first. Thank you!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
22.1 Legacy Series / Whois as a Diagnostic in the GUI
« on: January 31, 2022, 02:28:10 am »
Hi All, since the "whois" command is part of FreeBSD base and a really useful command, do you know if it is possible to make it part of the GUI under Diagnostics?
3
22.1 Legacy Series / Top Talkers old features
« on: January 31, 2022, 02:24:23 am »
Hi All, is there a specific reason why the FQDN toggle in the Top Talkers (Reporting -> Traffic -> Top Talkers) section is not there anymore? It was very useful to perform an instant DNS lookup of the IP instead of copying it and then move to another section (Interfaces -> Diagnostic -> DNS Lookup) to do it.
Also, it would nice to filter per interface and see the destination IP that the host on that interface is talking to with the direction of the traffic. If I filter by the 2 interfaces where the traffic is flowing there is now way to understand the traffic flow of the top hosts as it's a mix of IP addresses.
Thank you!
Also, it would nice to filter per interface and see the destination IP that the host on that interface is talking to with the direction of the traffic. If I filter by the 2 interfaces where the traffic is flowing there is now way to understand the traffic flow of the top hosts as it's a mix of IP addresses.
Thank you!
4
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Dashboard: CPU usage graph style
« on: November 24, 2020, 08:54:43 pm »
Feature request created: https://github.com/opnsense/core/issues/4480
Thank you Fright for your effort/help!
Thank you Fright for your effort/help!
5
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: DHCPv4 and multiple subnets
« on: November 24, 2020, 08:43:40 pm »
I have opened an issue on Github but I'm not sure why it has been marked as incomplete without any reason/explanation:
https://github.com/opnsense/core/issues/4450
Any idea why?
https://github.com/opnsense/core/issues/4450
Any idea why?
6
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Random Latency, Pings sometimes late
« on: November 24, 2020, 05:20:14 pm »
If you check the interface statistics widget does it report any errors/collisions?
7
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Dashboard: CPU usage graph style
« on: November 24, 2020, 05:16:18 pm »
The progress bar is the one appealing to me. But not sure about other users.
8
General Discussion / CLI vs GUI opinions
« on: November 23, 2020, 10:58:56 pm »
Hi All,
This post is mainly aimed to understand why the OPNsense userbase has chosen OPNsense rather than using a stock FreeBSD/OpenBSD install with pf managed by the CLI.
I come from a stock FreeBSD+pf+unbound+dhcpd setup since years and the main reason I wanted to move to a GUI was the fact that after a while that I was not logging into it I was going to forget commands and how to do things, and so I was always landing on google/personal notes to remember how to do it. Also the fact that I have a complete dashboard with the current overall status of the appliance gives me more quick awareness of what's passing through my firewall, instead of executing single commands to retrieve isolated information (i.e. top, pftop, systat queues, etc).
What I found online is that many users have the same common reason of not wanting to run a webserver+php on their appliances for security reason, and the fact that via CLI you have more control and learn more.
This post is mainly aimed to understand why the OPNsense userbase has chosen OPNsense rather than using a stock FreeBSD/OpenBSD install with pf managed by the CLI.
I come from a stock FreeBSD+pf+unbound+dhcpd setup since years and the main reason I wanted to move to a GUI was the fact that after a while that I was not logging into it I was going to forget commands and how to do things, and so I was always landing on google/personal notes to remember how to do it. Also the fact that I have a complete dashboard with the current overall status of the appliance gives me more quick awareness of what's passing through my firewall, instead of executing single commands to retrieve isolated information (i.e. top, pftop, systat queues, etc).
What I found online is that many users have the same common reason of not wanting to run a webserver+php on their appliances for security reason, and the fact that via CLI you have more control and learn more.
9
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Dashboard: CPU usage graph style
« on: November 23, 2020, 08:49:55 pm »
That would be great! Thank you very much!
10
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Dashboard: CPU usage graph style
« on: November 23, 2020, 05:38:12 pm »
This looks good to me! In my personal case if I need more historical CPU data I would go straight to the CPU usage graph, otherwise I just need the current snapshot once I'm on the dashboard.
My post aimed to gather opinions from users/devs prior to post a PR as it's not really a "must" change.
My post aimed to gather opinions from users/devs prior to post a PR as it's not really a "must" change.
11
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Dashboard: CPU usage graph style
« on: November 23, 2020, 06:22:17 am »
up
12
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Shaper not showing IPs/subnets in the status active flows
« on: November 12, 2020, 06:24:38 pm »
Thank you!
It looks like there have not been any update since July.
It looks like there have not been any update since July.
13
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Shaper not showing IPs/subnets in the status active flows
« on: November 12, 2020, 02:47:04 pm »
Up
14
20.7 Legacy Series / Re: Install and upgrade question
« on: November 11, 2020, 02:59:27 pm »
I had a similar issue with the latest OPNsense img file and rebooting the appliance fixed it.
15
20.7 Legacy Series / Dashboard: CPU usage graph style
« on: November 10, 2020, 05:16:30 pm »
Hi all,
this is mainly a personal/cosmetic taste and I just wanted to know what do you think about changing the CPU usage graph in the dashboard to be the same as the one for State table size/MBUF Usage/Memory usage/Disk usage?
Beside being the same style I think the bars provide more detailed view, always showing the percentage value of the usage.
Thank you,
tofaz
this is mainly a personal/cosmetic taste and I just wanted to know what do you think about changing the CPU usage graph in the dashboard to be the same as the one for State table size/MBUF Usage/Memory usage/Disk usage?
Beside being the same style I think the bars provide more detailed view, always showing the percentage value of the usage.
Thank you,
tofaz