"Recent posts
#21
German - Deutsch / Re: Dual WAN Setup mit IPv6 Pr...
Last post by martine - Today at 09:42:21 AMQuote from: Patrick M. Hausen on December 19, 2025, 10:58:09 PMHäng sie doch bitte einfach hier als Attachment an deine Foren-Posts. Das ist wirklich nicht zu viel verlangt.
Wenigstens hast du einen privaten Server benutzt und nicht sogenannte "Image Hosting Services", aber trotzdem. Bitte.
Hallo Patrick,
du hast Recht, dass ist natürlich nicht zu viel verlangt.
Ich bin beim Post erstellen aber in das 256kb Limit der Anhänge pro Post gelaufen.
Da ich einige Bilder habe, müsste ich das auf ca. 5 Post splitten was mir zu viel erschien, daher hatte ich mich für das einbinden über meinen Webspace entschieden. Soll ich das ganze auf Posts verteilen?
Sorry für die Umstände.
#22
General Discussion / Re: Unable to remove neighbor ...
Last post by eggflamingo - Today at 09:35:11 AMNot sure how precise i can be tbh.
i am running 25.7.10 currently. I have rebooted the router several times since creating this post.
I did notice something , that the entry from neighbors was back in the arp table after flushing it (which is probably correct since i couldn't remove it)
What i do is:
I go to Interfaces > Neighbors. Select the entry i want to remove (check-marked) > click delete button > click yes to confirm > get the message near Apply "after changing settings, please remember to apply them" > so i click Apply.
The entry still remains in the Neighbors list.
I then rebooted the router (For good measure). After reboot, the static entry in Neighbors is still there (as well as in the Diagnostics > Arp Table).
This situation is not the end of the world of course. i can simply ignore the reserved IP address for now. But it is odd.
i am running 25.7.10 currently. I have rebooted the router several times since creating this post.
I did notice something , that the entry from neighbors was back in the arp table after flushing it (which is probably correct since i couldn't remove it)
What i do is:
I go to Interfaces > Neighbors. Select the entry i want to remove (check-marked) > click delete button > click yes to confirm > get the message near Apply "after changing settings, please remember to apply them" > so i click Apply.
The entry still remains in the Neighbors list.
I then rebooted the router (For good measure). After reboot, the static entry in Neighbors is still there (as well as in the Diagnostics > Arp Table).
This situation is not the end of the world of course. i can simply ignore the reserved IP address for now. But it is odd.
#23
Intrusion Detection and Prevention / Re: Please updating the Defaul...
Last post by Wrigleys - Today at 07:38:18 AM+1 It would be really nice to get an updated version of both (to be fair, Unbound Blocklists are more recent than Suricata Rulesets).
I assume that you need to create an issue to address your request: https://github.com/opnsense/core/issues
Thank you and regards
Wrigleys
I assume that you need to create an issue to address your request: https://github.com/opnsense/core/issues
Thank you and regards
Wrigleys
#24
25.7, 25.10 Series / Re: 25.7.10 update fails with...
Last post by Gromhelm - Today at 05:34:18 AMOk, thanks! I tried today this morning with the same mirror, and it worked immediately. So this was a first for me. Good to know that this mirror feature exists!
#25
General Discussion / Re: block cameras to internet
Last post by passeri - Today at 04:58:35 AMQuote from: coffeecup25 on December 17, 2025, 03:29:50 PMThere's a good chance I am missing the point entirelyCorrect.
Quote from: coffeecup25 on December 17, 2025, 03:29:50 PMFind out the app that's sending the videos outside of your home and shut it down.
Effective if that were the question but it was not.
Correct solutions were provided. The rest is unhelpful waffle.
#26
General Discussion / Re: block cameras to internet
Last post by coffeecup25 - Today at 03:01:22 AMI had planned to end my time here so you kids have an exclusive playground. But, you got me. Hopefully nobody else will draw me back again.
I just watched all the packets that escaped from your network and now I know all your secrets. I guess you were right. I can't get into your system since it uses non-routable addresses. But somehow your frames and packets (inside joke) found their way to me of all people.
Seriously. Reddit has normal people on the OPNsense forum. What's wrong with you and the other little princes?
Why not explain how your 192.168.x.x or whatever gets out and gets into trouble? Without using NAT and SPI, which is the traditional way traffic goes from a network to a destination and finds it's way back. NAT and SPI are actual firewalls. Look up NAT / SPI and your hesitation and apprehensions about Internet Leakage might lessen.
Mull this over .... why does the real pro or the prince need to write a rule to prevent Internet Leakage, while almost nobody has even heard of this terrible situation? Why isn't it an OPNsense default? Millions of routers are out there without any owner or manufacturer awareness. This should become yours and that other's guy's crusade to wake everyone up. Hopefully, this will be my last post here.
At least you will still have the newbies to impress.
I just watched all the packets that escaped from your network and now I know all your secrets. I guess you were right. I can't get into your system since it uses non-routable addresses. But somehow your frames and packets (inside joke) found their way to me of all people.
Seriously. Reddit has normal people on the OPNsense forum. What's wrong with you and the other little princes?
Why not explain how your 192.168.x.x or whatever gets out and gets into trouble? Without using NAT and SPI, which is the traditional way traffic goes from a network to a destination and finds it's way back. NAT and SPI are actual firewalls. Look up NAT / SPI and your hesitation and apprehensions about Internet Leakage might lessen.
Mull this over .... why does the real pro or the prince need to write a rule to prevent Internet Leakage, while almost nobody has even heard of this terrible situation? Why isn't it an OPNsense default? Millions of routers are out there without any owner or manufacturer awareness. This should become yours and that other's guy's crusade to wake everyone up. Hopefully, this will be my last post here.
At least you will still have the newbies to impress.
#27
25.7, 25.10 Series / Re: DHCP Not working on Unifi ...
Last post by OPNenthu - Today at 12:41:05 AMQuote from: julsssark on December 19, 2025, 11:55:55 PMAnother option is to make your management VLAN something other than 1.
Well, the Native VLAN / network is "something other than 1." :)
There is no VLAN 1 on my network. It's not defined in OPNsense so for all intent and purpose it doesn't exist, whatever the UniFi UI thinks about it.
(Note: I'm not using any routing functions on my switch but instead forcing inter-VLAN traffic up to OPNsense, so the enforcement happens there)
In any case if anyone knows how to disassociate the default VLAN (1) from the Native VLAN on UniFi switches, I'd like to know. I haven't found an option for it. Is it necessary?
Edit: I think the more correct question is, can we change the default VLAN in UniFi to another number besides 1? Does it even matter, if it's not used anywhere outside of the UniFi devices?
#28
Hardware and Performance / Re: DEC750 Questions
Last post by DEC670airp414user - Today at 12:08:59 AMTo the original poster.
The appliance came with a 180 dollar business licenses that last a year.
Why did you decide to wipe and go to the community version?
The appliance came with a 180 dollar business licenses that last a year.
Why did you decide to wipe and go to the community version?
#29
25.7, 25.10 Series / Re: Version 25.7.9 did not cha...
Last post by kozistan - Today at 12:00:22 AMSuccess! After running `pkg install opnsense`, the system is now properly updated:
The missing core package has been resolved. System now shows:
I was wrong using the `-f` flag. The 105 packages that appeared in the installation prompt were dependencies that needed to be registered in the pkg database, not duplicates.
Thank you Franco!
Code Select
root@fw:~# pkg info opnsense
opnsense-25.7.10
Name : opnsense
Version : 25.7.10
Installed on : Fri Dec 19 23:45:11 2025 CET
CORE_VERSION : 25.7.10
CORE_HASH : c2f076f30
The missing core package has been resolved. System now shows:
Code Select
opnsense-version
OPNsense 25.7.10 (amd64)
I was wrong using the `-f` flag. The 105 packages that appeared in the installation prompt were dependencies that needed to be registered in the pkg database, not duplicates.
Thank you Franco!
#30
25.7, 25.10 Series / Re: DHCP Not working on Unifi ...
Last post by julsssark - December 19, 2025, 11:55:55 PMAnother option is to make your management VLAN something other than 1. Then you can use all VLANs and have no untagged traffic. All of my WAPs and switches are in the mgmt VLAN. I have a DNS entry for unifi that points to my controller and I have firewall rules in place to allow the devices to talk to the controller (that's in a server VLAN). As discussed earlier in this thread, you would need to have a second switch to avoid a scenario where you can't adopt a replacement switch.
