Recent posts

#21
Der radvd ist dazu da, dass die OPNsense den Clients in deinem LAN die nötigen Informationen gibt, nicht dafür, dass die OPNsense selbst auf WAN IPv6 bekommt.
#22
German - Deutsch / Re: Router Advertisement am P...
Last post by mbr89 - Today at 01:05:43 PM
https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/radvd.html

irgendwo hier muss der Hase im Pfeffer liegen
#23
German - Deutsch / Re: Router Advertisement am P...
Last post by mbr89 - Today at 01:04:06 PM
Quote from: Monviech (Cedrik) on Today at 12:03:59 PMBekommst du überhaupt eine Präfix Delegation vom Provider?

Am bintec RS123w-4G per Router Advertisement:

2a00:e180:14:9c72:XXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXX/64
2a00:e180:16:9a9c:XXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXX/64

https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/lookup?source=ripe&key=2a00:e180:10::%2F44&type=inet6num
#24
25.7, 25.10 Series / Re: 25.10.1 not affected by Fr...
Last post by franco - Today at 12:42:29 PM
> Is 25.10.1 not affected by this issue?

From your question it seems more relevant that you implied to ask why no business update was issued yet.

Because we have a process to ensure that a business update will be adequately assembled and vetted prior to release. 24 hours is not that much to ask for IMO.


Cheers,
Franco
#25
There will also be a hotfix for the business version today.
#26
25.7, 25.10 Series / 25.10.1 not affected by FreeBS...
Last post by rola - Today at 12:31:45 PM
Hi,

"This update is released mainly due to the fact that FreeBSD-SA-25:12.rtsold[2]
has impact on WAN-facing DHCPv6 connectivity being used"

i wonder that a fix for free community 25.7.10 published, but not for payed business release.

Is 25.10.1 not affected by this issue?
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-25:12.rtsold.asc

RoLa
#27
General Discussion / Re: Intel i226 2.5 GbE NIC on ...
Last post by Abdellah - Today at 12:17:50 PM
This video will explain more


#28
Tutorials and FAQs / Re: [HOWTO] Configure IPv6 in ...
Last post by Maurice - Today at 12:06:14 PM
Quote from: OPNenthu on Today at 11:43:14 AMDoes that mean that all internet connections would use IPv4 except when a site only supports IPv6?

Yes, and that's the main reason why it's not recommended.

NPT with a dynamic external prefix also isn't that easy to configure on OPNsense. You can track an interface, but not a delegated prefix which is what you typically want. There are workarounds though.

If you need a static prefix for e. g. internal DNS zones, use ULAs in addition to GUAs, not as a replacement.
#29
German - Deutsch / Re: PON FairNetz IPv6
Last post by Monviech (Cedrik) - Today at 12:03:59 PM
Bekommst du überhaupt eine Präfix Delegation vom Provider?
#30
Tutorials and FAQs / Re: [HOWTO] Configure IPv6 in ...
Last post by meyergru - Today at 12:01:57 PM
They are prioritized lower, but ULAs will not even be used for Internet access unless a NATed inbound connection is used first. And the priorization is about they target IP, which is a routeable IP, anyway.

You do not need them for outbound access at all - some people want to have IPv6 only and with dynamic prefixes, they do not have internal DNS. That is were ULA might be helpful. Then again, with dual stack, they will not be used when an IPv4 DNS entry exists.