Quote from: ajr on Today at 06:52:38 PMnat on igb1 inet from ! <opn2_igb1_plus_lo_addr> ...
nat on igb1 inet from <opn2_igb1_plus_lo_addr> ...
Quote from: pfry on Today at 08:05:21 PMThere's nothing wrong with a good passive system. It just costs money. (Note the "good".)
Quote from: pfry on Today at 08:05:21 PM(And, going off-topic a bit, it's particularly hard to passively cool a 100+W CPU in an 86+F (30+C) environment.)
Quote from: pfry on Today at 08:05:21 PMUnderstandable. A tradeoff I wasn't willing to make. My firewall is not my loudest device, but even if it was, I'd still make the same choice.We are talking normal home use. Not the rack filled with enterprise grade arista quad power redundant switches and 1kW rack mounted pc monsters running hypervisors. Please stay on track.
Quote from: pfry on Today at 08:05:21 PMSpeaking of thermal testing, mprime is generally more appropriate than memtest, but I don't know of a bootable package that contains a newer version (the UBCD's is a bit old). It's easy enough to fire up a live Linux or FreeBSD image and execute it - it just takes a bit more effort than a bootable package.
Quote from: Nullman on Today at 06:36:34 PM[...]Opnsense appliances should always be passive machines with no moving parts.[...]
Quote[...]I dont want to think about this. I want to setup my firewall and forget that its there.