last pid: 27749; load averages: 2.25, 2.23, 1.85 up 0+16:09:17 18:10:59
92 processes: 1 running, 91 sleeping
CPU: 39.2% user, 0.0% nice, 11.7% system, 0.0% interrupt, 49.1% idle
Mem: 4752M Active, 614M Inact, 26M Laundry, 1946M Wired, 401M Free
ARC: 1148M Total, 196M MFU, 754M MRU, 12M Anon, 20M Header, 163M Other
835M Compressed, 2203M Uncompressed, 2.64:1 Ratio
Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
96386 hostd 20 20 0 94M 11M uwait 0 24:44 99.90% hostwatch
17017 root 5 21 0 65M 32M kqread 2 23:58 99.71% syslog-ng
92246 root 1 20 0 15M 3932K CPU1 1 0:00 0.14% top
58889 root 1 24 0 59M 33M nanslp 2 0:00 0.10% php
48741 nobody 1 20 0 17M 5504K select 0 0:02 0.06% dnsmasq
520 root 4 68 0 121M 46M accept 3 0:47 0.05% python3.11
97534 root 1 20 0 23M 10M kqread 1 0:08 0.04% lighttpd
root@firewall:/var/log/hostwatch # ls -l
total 4032364
-rw------- 1 root wheel 4129140649 Jan 16 18:09 hostwatch_20260116.log
last pid: 93333; load averages: 1.43, 2.06, 1.94 up 0+16:17:01 18:18:43
98 processes: 1 running, 97 sleeping
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.2% idle
Mem: 4851M Active, 552M Inact, 29M Laundry, 1911M Wired, 396M Free
ARC: 1108M Total, 198M MFU, 725M MRU, 760K Anon, 18M Header, 164M Other
791M Compressed, 2139M Uncompressed, 2.70:1 Ratio
Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
57652 root 1 20 0 15M 3980K CPU0 0 0:00 0.16% top
85230 root 1 21 0 59M 33M nanslp 0 0:00 0.10% php
16847 root 1 20 0 24M 8112K select 3 0:07 0.07% ntpd
60180 root 1 20 0 14M 2976K bpf 1 0:00 0.06% filterlog
17017 root 3 20 0 67M 36M kqread 1 30:45 0.06% syslog-ng
520 root 4 68 0 129M 45M accept 2 0:50 0.06% python3.11
97534 root 1 20 0 23M 9948K kqread 0 0:08 0.05% lighttpd
48741 nobody 1 20 0 17M 5624K select 2 0:03 0.03% dnsmasq
root@firewall:~ # iostat -x
extended device statistics
device r/s w/s kr/s kw/s ms/r ms/w ms/o ms/t qlen %b
mmcsd0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
mmcsd0bo 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
mmcsd0bo 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
nda0 2 9 20.5 238.7 0 0 2 1 0 1
pass0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Quote from: yeraycito on January 16, 2026, 04:09:26 PMBy default, discovery is configured on all interfaces. I tried restricting it to LAN only, but the service stops and won't restart. If I switch it back to all interfaces, it works without problems.I am seeing the same. I tried restricting it to LAN and Wireguard and the service stops and won't restart.
Quote from: OPNenthu on January 16, 2026, 05:37:04 AMFortunately many homes here are wired with coaxial for TV (antenna, satellite, and cable all use it) so I was able to use that with MoCA-Ethernet adapters.
Quote from: franco on January 16, 2026, 10:25:16 PMyou can see configured lifetimes in ifconfig and with -L switch you can see how much is leftOn the WAN interface, ifconfig shows the lifetime of the interface address (IA_NA). But where do I see the lifetime of the prefix (IA_PD)? On the tracking LAN interface, ifconfig does not show a lifetime.
Quote from: franco on January 16, 2026, 10:25:16 PMNA was setting vltime and pltime correctlyI can confirm this. IA_NA pltime is lower than vltime: inet6 2001:db8:6490:5d00::2 prefixlen 128 pltime 270 vltime 300
Quote from: franco on January 16, 2026, 10:25:16 PMfrom my testing so far dhcp6c renews far more frequently than pltimeFrom my testing, dhcp6c renews after half of vltime. So as long as pltime > vltime/2, no problem.
Quote from: franco on January 16, 2026, 10:25:16 PMThe key thing here is that we want to see the ifconfig -L times so we can actually distinguish which prefix was the last one assigned and use that as the primary one for e.g. radvd. Some ISPs renew with a new prefix but having the first one stick around and no way to distinguish because they both do not expire was suboptimal and at some point the old one disappears but there is no renew triggering a radvd reload so then the prefix stops working for clients.Excellent! This has plagued me a lot and the workarounds I had to implement are nightmare fuel.
Quote from: franco on January 16, 2026, 10:25:16 PMI was a bit surprised to find all these related bugs for just trying to do what the standard intended.Unfortunately, I'm not surprised at all.
Quote from: marjohn56 on January 16, 2026, 01:11:01 PMThe mesh works really well providing you make sure there's a good signal between the master and slave device. Preferably only slave one device to each wired master.