Quote from: mrThirsty on May 06, 2026, 11:56:30 AMall devices both wired and wireless can't seem to do anything during thisFirst thing to check: what do the lights do? Do switch / NIC indicate heavy traffic? No traffic at all? Normal traffic?
Quote from: mrThirsty on May 06, 2026, 11:56:30 AM, I am leaning toward it being a WAN-related issue as on the odd occasion when the freeze up has been long enough, I am still able to log into the Admin portal on my router.So the LAN part is perfectly fine (unless you're using a dedicated admin port?), and the devices on your LAN can probably communicate normally among themselves. And the Protectli isn't frozen either, nor is the network stack. Keep the dashboard open and observe it for CPU / RAM / whatever spikes that shouldn't be there when the lockup happens. You probably need to add a couple of useful widgets first, like "CPU", "Traffic Graphs" and "Thermal Sensors".
Quote from: mrThirsty on May 06, 2026, 11:56:30 AMI have determined the issue is my OpnSense router as I have removed it from my network and then ran each of the ISP modem and Amplify-HD as the router for a day each and during those two days I did not have any of the freezes. I have also taken the extreme move of completely wiping my router and just having it run as it comes out of the box, just as a DHCP server, no ZenArmour or OpenVPN etc. and I still get the freezing. No matter what configuration I run my network in, as soon as OpnSense is the router, the freezing happens.That rules out updates for ZA or other blocklists clogging up the machine. I'd look for WAN-related events like IP address changes, possibly interface-related if we assume that the WAN interface might simply have a defect. Would it be possible to reassign the WAN and one of the other interfaces (the box has 4 AFAICS) to see if the issue persists unchanged (so, on WAN) or sticks to the interface?
Quote from: pOpY2k25 on May 03, 2026, 06:12:41 PMBUT Finally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The i226-v driver bug i am reffering to in #110 posts (performance loss when ASPM is on) is fixed in unraid 7.3.0-rc1 (kernel 6.18.23).
Here is the commit which fixed the issue: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0325143b59c6c6d79987afc57d2456e7a20d13b7
Basically disabling aspm L1.2, preventing the performance issue with minimal higher power consumption.
So with this commit, i can recommend the Intel i226-v for low power opnsense/unraid builds WITH full ASPM support and no performance loss.
The c-states rabbit hole has become smaller for me
QuoteIs NIC firmware V2.32 worth the flash, or should I focus on BIOS tweaks first?Quote from: nero355 on May 05, 2026, 08:46:06 PMI would always check with the manufacturer first in this case and flash a newer BIOS/UEFI if they have one or think it would help!
QuoteA Certificate Revocation Lists (CRL) is a list of certificates that have been revoked by the certificate authority. Some services in OPNsense can use these to validate if a certificate is still valid to use even though it might not be expired.
Defining a CRL in OPNsense is not very complicated, just go to System ‣ Trust ‣ Revocation and click on the <+> sign for your (local) certificate authority to create a new CRL. When a CRL exists, you may edit it and add or remove certificates in it (using the pencil icon).

Quote from: rama3124 on May 06, 2026, 09:34:35 AMand also in the unbound Query forwarding domain field.This : https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/unbound.html#query-forwarding
QuoteYet for some reason it only resolves correctly if i do unraid.lan.internal.Then you have got .lan configured somewhere and need to remove it.
Also none of my other hostnames resolve (e.g. homeassistant.lan.internal).
QuoteJust confirming, the hostname is the whatever appears in the 'Host' field of Dnsmasq DNS & DHCP - Hosts?See here : https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/dnsmasq.html#dns-settings
Quote from: franco on May 06, 2026, 05:26:48 PMMost of it is Python. According to https://peps.python.org/pep-0719/ 3.13.14 will be out by Tuesday, 2026-06-09.Does that future include kicking out that weird snake at some point ?? :P
In the meantime we'd have to put in a lot of effort to micro manage Python fixes and potentially clashing with similar efforts in FreeBSD ports. It's not a good option for us at the moment with the priorities we have.
So, yes, 2026. Welcome to the future.