Recent posts

#1

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: OPNsense WAN behind Vodafo...

Last post by franco - Today at 06:20:17 PM

Ok so that's not it. Timing also doesn't match the 26.1.8 release.

One theory is that Vodafone changed something about their approach and is now ignoring the request. The crafty French people having to deal with Orange have done packet captures on the ISP devices in order to mock all their weird request/send options.


Cheers,
Franco

#2

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: OPNsense WAN behind Vodafo...

Last post by sergej - Today at 05:46:33 PM

I tried DHCP4 basic and DHCP4 advanced with Send Options > dhcp-class-identifier "vodafone";
Did not seam to make a difference.

Thanks
Sergej

#3

Virtual private networks / Re: Gateway monitoring and pro...

Last post by rumshot - Today at 05:39:55 PM

Hi Bob,

I will try it here . I was afraid the tunnel ip was somehow tied to a nat on proton side .
Doesn't hurt to try .

Many thanks

I won't be able to have two connections with proton, once their tunnels always have the same address

Just change the first 2 with a different number (e.g. 10.3.0.2).

#4

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: OPNsense WAN behind Vodafo...

Last post by franco - Today at 05:06:20 PM

Are you using DHCPv4 advanced mode on that WAN?

There are unfortunate bugs in well unchartered territory since the security fix in 26.1.8 regarding what constitutes good and bad input in these fields lacking validation...


Cheers,
Franco

#5

Virtual private networks / Re: Forcing Outbound VPN Conne...

Last post by cardblower - Today at 04:41:38 PM

Thanks all for the replies, I'll take a look at the policy routing to see what I can do.

This is a new thing for me, not touched the routing side before.

kind regards.

[bridge-mcsnoop]

#6

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: One of the networks stops ...

Last post by meyergru - Today at 04:33:36 PM

I assume you have bridge-mcsnoop off like described here and that the bridge is VLAN-aware?

#7

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: Virtual IP

Last post by Seimus - Today at 04:28:05 PM

Not at all. You can change the IPs or set the VIP as you like.
In this example its like this just for simpler explanation and allocation of IPs.


Regards,
S.

#8

General Discussion / Re: youtube going offline

Last post by Nullman - Today at 04:22:27 PM

its a real ipv4, all other traffic works ok no real problems.
i set the MTU to be 1500 and up until now everything is working now. ill update again in a few hours to make sure that this was really the problem

If the issue is still there, try using this privacy front end for youtube https://inv.nadeko.net/ and let us know if it works.

#9

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: Virtual IP

Last post by nero355 - Today at 04:18:33 PM

https://github.com/SeimusS/Pihole-HA

I always feel like this :

Subnet:    192.168.1.0/24
PRIMARY:   192.168.1.1/24
SECONDARY: 192.168.1.2/24
VIP:       192.168.1.3/24

Should be :

Subnet:    192.168.1.0/24
PRIMARY:   192.168.1.2/24
SECONDARY: 192.168.1.3/24
VIP:       192.168.1.1/24

But maybe I am just weird :)

Thanks for posting exactly what I was talking about though! Nicely done! ;)

#10

German - Deutsch / Re: LogIn-Seite vor Captive Po...

Last post by viragomann - Today at 04:16:21 PM

Nun habe ich das Problem, dass bei neueren Geräten die Weiterleitung auf den entsprechenden Port blockiert wird.

Welche Weiterleitung?
Du hast doch geschrieben, dass die Seite per QR-Code-Scan geöffnet wird. Wo wird dann weitergeleitet?

Vielleicht mögen die Geräte den verdeckten speziellen Port nicht?
Ich verstehe aber auch nicht, wie der verschleiert sein soll, wenn er im QR-Code steckt. Ist die Funktionsbeschreibung wirklich vollständig?

Um den Port speziellen Port loszuwerden, könntest du jedenfalls einen Reverse-Proxy in Betracht ziehen.