Recent posts

#1

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: 26.1.7_2: issue with ACME ...

Last post by Rene78 - Today at 07:16:09 PM

I have tested this and was unable to reproduce this issue.
Please try again and provide the full ACME Log and all "AcmeClient" entries from the System Log.

I can do this when I have computer access again in a few days.

However, sopex mentions it will be fixed in the next version.... This indicates bug...

Maybe the setenv variable had been set in your case earlier and therefore it works? Is that possible?

Regardless, i'll dig into it in a few days time and help out isolating any issue. Thanks

#2

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: [BUG] Qfeeds cron inconsis...

Last post by franco - Today at 07:15:47 PM

Thanks for letting me know :)

#3

General Discussion / Re: Postfix message_size_limit

Last post by vpx23 - Today at 06:45:30 PM

OK, I found the explanation on Wikipedia:

The IBM System 360 and the related disk and tape systems set the byte at 8 bits and documented capacities in decimal units.[38] The early 8-, 5.25- and 3.5-inch floppies gave capacities in multiples of 1024, using "KB" rather than the more accurate "KiB". The later, larger, 8-, 5.25- and 3.5-inch floppies gave capacities in a hybrid notation, i.e., multiples of 1024,000, using "KB" = 1024 B and "MB" = 1024,000 B. Early 5.25-inch disks used decimal[dubious – discuss] even though they used 128-byte and 256-byte sectors.[39] Hard disks used mostly 256-byte and then 512-byte before 4096-byte blocks became standard.[40]

Source

Being an IBM product it makes sense that this hybrid notation was used in Postfix.

#4

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: [BUG] Qfeeds cron inconsis...

Last post by szty0pa - Today at 06:40:41 PM

Thanks Franco, 26.1.7_3 solved this for me.

#5

German - Deutsch / Re: Öffentlicher IPv6-Suffix ä...

Last post by mooh - Today at 06:27:46 PM

"Request prefix only" ist eine Einstellung des DHCPv6-Clients und nicht PPP-spezifisch. Es geht nur darum, ob der dhcp6c auch IA_NA anfragt.
Bei der Telekom ist es völlig egal, ob man diese Option setzt oder nicht, denn per DHCPv6 bekommt man dort ausschließlich ein Präfix (IA_PD), keine Adresse (IA_NA). Für die Konfiguration der WAN-Adresse wird dort wie gesagt SLAAC verwendet.

Ich höre Deine Worte, aber bei meiner OPNsense hat "Request prefix only" am Telekom Anschluss für Privatkunden, aber sonst gleicher Konfiguration wie der TO, genau die Auswirkung eben keine GUA zu bekommen, respektive eine zu bekommen, wenn nicht gesetzt. Könnte natürlich am Privat- vs Geschäftkundenanschluss liegen.

Und die EUI-64 ist auch von der MAC des Interfaces abgeleitet, über die die PPPoE Verbindung läuft.

#6

26.1, 26,4 Series / Re: WOL Cron Job returned erro...

Last post by franco - Today at 06:05:21 PM

Please update to the latest hotfix.


Cheers,
Franco

#7

Announcements / Re: OPNsense 26.1.7 released

Last post by franco - Today at 03:44:23 PM

A hotfix release was issued as 26.1.7_3:

o backend: configctl: support -f cache flush parameter to fix cache invalidation preamble "!" pass

[192.168.50.255 MAC_ADDRESS]

#8

26.1, 26,4 Series / WOL Cron Job returned error (1...

Last post by Seedman - Today at 03:34:17 PM

Hi,

I've been using the OS-WOL plug-in on OPNsense, with a daily cron job to wake my server from sleep for the last 2 years.
This has worked flawlessly from 24.7 all the way to 26.1.6.

The cron job started failing ever since I upgraded to 26.1.7 on the 1st of May 2026.

I can still wake my server up from the GUI Services - WOL. However the cron job fails. When I check the logs under system - log files - backend I get a "wol wake 192.168.50.255 xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx] returned Error (1) message.

I find this strange as I haven't made any changes to the WOL Cron Job in over 2 years and it now fails every time.

Just so its clear the parameters for the cron job were :- 192.168.50.255 MAC_ADDRESS

Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.

#9

General Discussion / Re: Postfix message_size_limit

Last post by Patrick M. Hausen - Today at 02:26:55 PM

I read that as 512 x 100.000. One power of two, one power of ten.

#10

General Discussion / Postfix message_size_limit

Last post by vpx - Today at 02:08:37 PM

In the Postfix plugin the default value is 51200000 Bytes.

I know it follows the convention of the original documentation.

message_size_limit
(I linked via Wayback Machine as I don't know why the Postfix site is currently offline)

But does anybody know why that is?

I mean it is calculated as 50x1024x1000 = 51200000 Bytes.

Shouldn't it either be 50x1024x1024 = 52.428.800 Bytes or 50x1000x1000 = 50.000.000 Bytes?

I know the diference between KiB and KB, MiB and MB etc. but why is it a mixed case here?