Quote from: pfry on April 07, 2026, 05:03:58 PMTaxes = vaporized (yet somehow still alive and aware), but hey, those are inevitable.That's because you are paying the taxes that the likes of Musk, Zuckerberg and Trump do not pay.
e.e.e.e.67 > 255.255.255.255.68: xid:<censored> flags:0x8000 Y:c.c.c.c S:b.b.b.b ether <censored> vend-rfc1048
DHCP:OFFER SM:255.240.0.0 DG:g.g.g.g NS:e.e.e.e DN:"local" LT:3116 SID:e.e.e.e BF:"/pxelinux.0" (DF) [tos 0x10]
udhcpd sends: ... 00 00 2f 70 78 65 6c 69 6e 75 78 2e 30 00 00 ...e.e.e.e.67 > 255.255.255.255.68: xid:<censored> flags:0x8000 Y:c.c.c.c S:b.b.b.b ether <censored> sname "<censored>" file "/pxelinux.0" vend-rfc1048
DHCP:OFFER SID:e.e.e.e LT:864000 SM:255.240.0.0 DG:g.g.g.g NS:e.e.e.e DN:"local"
Quote from: nero355 on April 24, 2026, 03:39:20 PMWould it be an option to have a dedicated PXE Boot VLAN on your network ?That would be an excellent option for actual thin clients, as this kind of boot is quite insecure and should ideally be confined even on the LAN.
In the past I have worked for a company that had this and the software doing the PXE Boot stuff was some kind of dedicated Linux distro at the time.
So in this case OPNsense would be just the Router providing internet access for all those NetBoot images :)
Quote from: mooh on April 23, 2026, 01:41:32 PMThis is where I don't understand what you're looking for.I'm not looking for anything any more - my stuff is all working. I'm continuing the discussion trying to answer questions and maybe explain my setup in case it helps anyone else in the future, and happy to keep doing that if it is useful.
Quote from: pavlon1988 on February 27, 2026, 08:07:45 AMа чем они ещё вкрячиваются ?))например, использую штатные средства опнсенсе а не прямое редактирование конфига?
Quote from: Qtronix on April 23, 2026, 11:30:59 AMГдеж ты раньше то был??так у китайцев минимум год как есть сборка.. там правда упор на Clash сделан.. удобнее он им да и правила роутинга можно писать прямо в интерфейсе.
Quote from: nero355 on April 23, 2026, 03:09:24 PMQuote from: e97 on April 23, 2026, 01:57:49 AMI was able to create a single port forward, but how do I do a range?The same way, but it seems someone made a typo at the Destination Port field : It should show the same text as the Source Port does ?!
Source Port shows : Single Port or Range
Destination Port shows : Single Port
But in both fields you can enter for example 10000-10100 and there is no error shown or anything at Destination Port so I guess that needs to be looked at by the developers :)
Quote from: meyergru on April 24, 2026, 06:03:38 PMCG-NAT does not handle IPv6I know, but some providers do CG-NAT IPv4 + Regular IPv6 and the results can be very "mixed" sometimes to say the least...
Quote from: odites999 on April 24, 2026, 08:15:46 PMThe last post was not correct. The problem continues. I'll try to disable IPv6 globally to see if that helps.You can edit previous posts : Either Quick Edit or via MORE... and then the full posts editing option ;)
Quote from: ayanami_rei on April 24, 2026, 06:26:55 PMi dont understand the error and warning message.Because things can have delays and/or do not start in the order you would expect them to start so sometimes you get these "timing issues" so to speak...