Hi Franco. Yeah I saw the patches from Jason on the bug report. He's a good guy. I've been on the WireGuard mailing list since forever, it's how I spotted the plugin had gone stable on here. Thanks again. :)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: mimugmail on November 29, 2018, 06:19:32 AMQuote from: Rainmaker on November 29, 2018, 03:48:43 AM
Unfortunately I'm now hitting issues with the plugin itself, crashing a lot (and every reboot). I'm troubleshooting this but I do know that's an issue with the (beta) plugin rather than the config. Hopefully a bugfix/patch is issued soon. Either way, we know it works!
No, the plugin is stable, the freebsd port itself has problems. Or better the freebsd kernel when you installed OPNsense on UFS. It causes stack traces (so, reboots). For some it works, for some not .. but it's not in our hand anymore.
Quote from: KantFreeze on August 02, 2018, 04:27:59 PM
Rainmaker,
I think I'm not communicating well. I'm not saying that FreeBSD has poor network performance. I'm saying that with the particular piece of hardware I happen to own FreeBSD has roughly half the throughput of linux and is struggles to use it efficiently. The FreeBSD development thread listed earlier suggests that it's not the SMP performance of the pf that's the issue, but something to do with some oddness in the embedded intel NIC.
But, most of these benchmarks are almost two years old. I'm wondering if at this point the problem with this particular hardware might be fixed and if people might be able to get similar performance under FreeBSD with tweaks.
/boot/loader.conf.local
legal.intel_ipw.license_ack=1
legal.intel_iwi.license_ack=1