From earlier posts, I was used to constructive help on this forum. Not to people just slapping each other with RTFM or STFU.
And then making fun about it with each other.
This kind of condescending communication is not constructive at all.
I tried to form some sense of your little unkind words. But I just did not understand. Because like I kept saying, it was different to what I was used to, and I didnt know if something went wrong during an update or something changed.
And something did change.
As I went over all the options in making a new rule in destination nat.
I found that the 3 options under: 'option firewall rule' are new (to me at least).
manual, pass, register rule.
All my rules seem to be manual, and that's why they both need to be updated. Unlike before, when I only updated in one location.
And this is why it behaved differently than I was used to.
The manual confirms that its new.
https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/nat.html#destination-nat-port-forward
Thanks.
And then making fun about it with each other.
This kind of condescending communication is not constructive at all.
I tried to form some sense of your little unkind words. But I just did not understand. Because like I kept saying, it was different to what I was used to, and I didnt know if something went wrong during an update or something changed.
And something did change.
As I went over all the options in making a new rule in destination nat.
I found that the 3 options under: 'option firewall rule' are new (to me at least).
manual, pass, register rule.
All my rules seem to be manual, and that's why they both need to be updated. Unlike before, when I only updated in one location.
And this is why it behaved differently than I was used to.
The manual confirms that its new.
https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/nat.html#destination-nat-port-forward
Thanks.
"