Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - lebertu

#1
I think the suricata conf is set by opnsense to auto for threading, I have a similar card to yours (x550) and 4 CPUS and when I set threads to 4 I get poor performance, 2 threads for 4 queues is ok and able to achieve wire rate.

https://suricata.readthedocs.io/en/suricata-5.0.6/capture-hardware/netmap.html

I have noticed the same behaviour you're describing on pfsense, suricata seems to be pinned to one core not sure why ?

#2
Hardware and Performance / Re: KVM "poor" performance ?
December 11, 2017, 07:39:57 PM
I thank you sir  8) :

#3
Hello,

I've decided to go OpnSense for my router appliance, I've decided to run it on my old media server that I've converted to a virtualization server on debian (mini-itx, i5-3470s, 8G RAM, intel 350 t2).

I've allocated 2vcpu and 3G to OpnSense and the 2 nic are running on passthrough mode (virtio), i was not able to make VFIO work because of iommu grouping ...

When connecting the media converter directly to my laptop I'm getting 930Mb/s but when connecting it to my box I'm getting 480 Mb/s.

I'm new to OpnSense so I'm currently running the default configuration but I'm not sure what is the bottleneck :

- OpnSense ? filtering ?
- Virtualization ?
- Hardware issue ? "fake" intel nic ?