Where is TCP processed - CPU? Networkinterface? Elsewhere?

Started by chemlud, January 19, 2026, 09:10:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Hi, have a problem that bugs me for years, no solution found yet:

Two clients with Linux, same update status:

1. SLOW: Libretrend i7 with Coreboot, Realtek NIC

2. FAST: Old Dell Precision M6500 notebook with Intel NIC.

Problem: when downloading e.g. updates, the FAST ist 30-times faster than SLOW, see attached.

Same mirrors,RJ45 cables changed twice, both attached to the same switch. So no real explanation.

Yesterday I did some iperf between the two clients.

For UDP, it does not matter, which is server and whicch is client:

20260118145326,SLOW,FAST,45678,1,0.0-30.0,3935190,1048952,0.025,0,2677,0.000,0

20260118145446,FAST,SLOW,45678,1,0.0-30.0,3935190,1048950,-nan,0,-1,-0.000,0

But for TCP direction matters:

20260118144505,SLOW,FAST,45678,1,0.0-30.0,3533963328,941434163

20260118144740,FAST,SLOW,45678,1,0.0-30.1,1690173504,449722645

-------------------------

First thought: RJ45 in SLOW machine is Realtek. But I have Realtek in other machines with same linux, always maxing out the bandwith possible. So I don't think it'S simply Realtek.

Why only TCP makes a difference? Is there offloading and that doesn't work properly in the SLOW machine? Maybe due to Coreboot?

Any ideas how this difference in TCP-speed might be explainable?

:-)
kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....

Your topic name is a bit intriguing.
When you think about a packet, the finial destination on a device is the CPU. If a packet is delivered its being pegged to the CPU to process it. Of cource the packet needs to be 1st processed on the NIC.

What Distro you are using?
What realtek NIC does it use?
What is the realtek driver loaded for the NIC?
Did you try to upgrade the BIOS?
What are the temps during high volume downloads/uploads?
Can you post the NIC statistics (counters)?
Did you disabled ASPM?

Regards,
S.


Networking is love. You may hate it, but in the end, you always come back to it.

OPNSense HW
APU2D2 - deceased
N5105 - i226-V | Patriot 2x8G 3200 DDR4 | L 790 512G - VM HA(SOON)
N100   - i226-V | Crucial 16G  4800 DDR5 | S 980 500G - PROD

Quote from: Seimus on January 19, 2026, 10:07:51 AM1 What Distro you are using?
2 What realtek NIC does it use?
3 What is the realtek driver loaded for the NIC?
4 Did you try to upgrade the BIOS?
5 What are the temps during high volume downloads/uploads?
6 Can you post the NIC statistics (counters)?
7 Did you disabled ASPM?

1 opensuse Tumbleweed

2 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8211/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 07)
  Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller

3 Kernel driver in use: r8169
  Kernel modules: r8169

4 Yes, but it's Coreboot, the company Libretrend dose not provide any newer Coreboot version

5 Unremarkable temps, cooling is appropriate

6 like this? On the SLOW i have:
    sudo ethtool -S eth0
    NIC statistics:
    tx_packets: 3175999
    rx_packets: 8314948
    tx_errors: 0
    rx_errors: 0
    rx_missed: 36
    align_errors: 0
    tx_single_collisions: 0
    tx_multi_collisions: 0
    unicast: 8313262
    broadcast: 1686
    multicast: 0
    tx_aborted: 0
    tx_underrun: 0

7 No. It's an onboard NIC, so relevant?
    sudo ethtool --show-eee eth0 
    EEE settings for eth0:
    enabled - inactive
    0 (us)
        Supported EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
                                  1000baseT/Full
        Advertised EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
                                    1000baseT/Full
        Link partner advertised EEE link modes:  Not reported


kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....

To make things even more complicated:

- I downloaded a large file on SLOW with FF 147.0 and get an amazing 100MB/s...

What's going on here? Only the weekly updates of Tumbleweed slow?!?! But it's not the server, see OP.
kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....

I would definitely advice to disable ASPM, either via BIOS or in Linux.
ASPM enabled can do a lot of performance related problems and realtek is not excluded from this.

The NIC stats, look good, there is no errors or dirty packets seen.

In regards of your testing, you have here some interesting results;
1. Iperf > fast to slow = throughput limited
2. Linux package updates = throughput slow
3. Browser download = fast

For
1. Iperf > fast to slow
Can you try to restest this but set P2 at least to trigger multicore spread of iperf? And post the results
Try scenarios where the slow is the client as well server, and during scenario where its client try with and without the flag -R

2. Linux package updates
This one is curious, cause you can be rate limited, try to refresh your mirrors


3. Browser download
No clue about this, I would assume similar results as for Iperf, but maybe this can be due to the fact the browsers is using multiple cores to process the packets.

As well what kind of congestion algoritm are you using? Maybe you can try to switch it to BBR.


Regards,
S.
Networking is love. You may hate it, but in the end, you always come back to it.

OPNSense HW
APU2D2 - deceased
N5105 - i226-V | Patriot 2x8G 3200 DDR4 | L 790 512G - VM HA(SOON)
N100   - i226-V | Crucial 16G  4800 DDR5 | S 980 500G - PROD

Thanks for reading.

RE 2: Mirrors are "hardcoded" and identical on FAST and SLOW. The download of weekly packages on FAST and SLOW is simultaneously in the attachment of OP, so how/why only one client should be rate limited?

Congestion algorithm? Hmmm... ;-)

RE: BBR

I had in Tumbleweed:

sudo sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_available_congestion_control
net.ipv4.tcp_available_congestion_control = reno cubic

Then I followed this:

https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-to-enable-tcp-bbr-to-improve-network-speed-on-linux/

and did

sudo nano /etc/sysctl.conf

-> and add the following two lines:

net.core.default_qdisc=fq
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=bbr


Then I have after

sudo sysctl -p
sudo sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = bbr

kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....

Quote from: chemlud on January 20, 2026, 02:22:33 PMRE 2: Mirrors are "hardcoded" and identical on FAST and SLOW. The download of weekly packages on FAST and SLOW is simultaneously in the attachment of OP, so how/why only one client should be rate limited?
True if this is the case. I assumed you have dynamic mirrors and downloads are in different intervals. If you would be rate limited it would be for the Public IP. But if both of them are NATed behind one, it would affect them both. BTW based on this when you only run the update for the slow, result is the same correct?

Quote from: chemlud on January 20, 2026, 02:22:33 PMCongestion algorithm? Hmmm... ;-)
I could talk about this whole day long, but to simplify it, its the often omitted brother of the TCPs scaling window.
Sender > Responsible for the Scaling Window
Receiver > Responsible for the Congestion management

Congestion tells the sender to slow down, and how to recover from the congestion event (this not 100% correct but enough to see both of them are important).


Current enabled congestion algo, default should be at least CUBIC
sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control
All available congestion algos
sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_available_congestion_control
For BRR you you usally need to enable some extra flags in system but nothing to hard...

Regards,
S.
Networking is love. You may hate it, but in the end, you always come back to it.

OPNSense HW
APU2D2 - deceased
N5105 - i226-V | Patriot 2x8G 3200 DDR4 | L 790 512G - VM HA(SOON)
N100   - i226-V | Crucial 16G  4800 DDR5 | S 980 500G - PROD

Quote from: Seimus on January 20, 2026, 03:05:44 PM... BTW based on this when you only run the update for the slow, result is the same correct?


Yes, SLOW ist slow for years, all other Tumbleweeds are normal download speed.

RE ASPM

Apparently regulated in BIOS (not reachable with Coreboot) or via a kernel boot command.

Have to check when not remote, don't want to loose the machine by tinkering with kerne boot.
kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....

RE ASPM

I did

sudo lspci -vvv


01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8211/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 07)
        Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 18
        Region 0: I/O ports at 2000 [size=256]
        Region 2: Memory at d1300000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Region 4: Memory at d1200000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
                Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
        Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
                Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
        Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, IntMsgNum 1
                DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <64us
                        ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset- SlotPowerLimit 10W TEE-IO-
                DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
                        RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
                        MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 4096 bytes
                DevSta: CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
                LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s unlimited, L1 <64us
                        ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp-
                LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, LnkDisable- CommClk+
                        ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt- FltModeDis-
                LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1
                        TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
                DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+ NROPrPrP- LTR-
                         10BitTagComp- 10BitTagReq- OBFF Not Supported, ExtFmt- EETLPPrefix-
                         EmergencyPowerReduction Not Supported, EmergencyPowerReductionInit-
                         FRS- TPHComp- ExtTPHComp-
                         AtomicOpsCap: 32bit- 64bit- 128bitCAS-
                DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-
                         AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn-
                         IDOReq- IDOCompl- LTR- EmergencyPowerReductionReq-
                         10BitTagReq- OBFF Disabled, EETLPPrefixBlk-
                LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 2.5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-
                         Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
                         Compliance Preset/De-emphasis: -6dB de-emphasis, 0dB preshoot
                LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB, EqualizationComplete- EqualizationPhase1-
                         EqualizationPhase2- EqualizationPhase3- LinkEqualizationRequest-
                         Retimer- 2Retimers- CrosslinkRes: unsupported, FltMode-
        Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=4 Masked-
                Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00000000
                PBA: BAR=4 offset=00000800
        Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data
pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: No such device
                Not readable
        Capabilities: [100 v1] Advanced Error Reporting
                UESta:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP-
                        ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol- UncorrIntErr- BlockedTLP- AtomicOpBlocked- TLPBlockedErr-
                        PoisonTLPBlocked- DMWrReqBlocked- IDECheck- MisIDETLP- PCRC_CHECK- TLPXlatBlocked-
                UEMsk:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP-
                        ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol- UncorrIntErr- BlockedTLP- AtomicOpBlocked- TLPBlockedErr-
                        PoisonTLPBlocked- DMWrReqBlocked- IDECheck- MisIDETLP- PCRC_CHECK- TLPXlatBlocked-
                UESvrt: DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+
                        ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol- UncorrIntErr- BlockedTLP- AtomicOpBlocked- TLPBlockedErr-
                        PoisonTLPBlocked- DMWrReqBlocked- IDECheck- MisIDETLP- PCRC_CHECK- TLPXlatBlocked-
                CESta:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr- CorrIntErr- HeaderOF-
                CEMsk:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr+ CorrIntErr- HeaderOF-
                AERCap: First Error Pointer: 00, ECRCGenCap+ ECRCGenEn- ECRCChkCap+ ECRCChkEn-
                        MultHdrRecCap- MultHdrRecEn- TLPPfxPres- HdrLogCap-
                HeaderLog: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
        Capabilities: [140 v1] Virtual Channel
                Caps:   LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1
                Arb:    Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128-
                Ctrl:   ArbSelect=Fixed
                Status: InProgress-
                VC0:    Caps:   PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans-
                        Arb:    Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256-
                        Ctrl:   Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=ff
                        Status: NegoPending- InProgress-
        Capabilities: [160 v1] Device Serial Number 01-00-00-00-68-4c-e0-00
        Kernel driver in use: r8169
        Kernel modules: r8169

so apparently

...
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled
...

ASPM should not be in the way, or?
kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....

Yes, that means ASPM is disabled for the NIC.


Regards,
S.
Networking is love. You may hate it, but in the end, you always come back to it.

OPNSense HW
APU2D2 - deceased
N5105 - i226-V | Patriot 2x8G 3200 DDR4 | L 790 512G - VM HA(SOON)
N100   - i226-V | Crucial 16G  4800 DDR5 | S 980 500G - PROD

Quote from: chemlud on January 19, 2026, 09:10:41 AMHi, have a problem that bugs me for years, no solution found yet:

Two clients with Linux, same update status:

1. SLOW: Libretrend i7 with Coreboot, Realtek NIC

2. FAST: Old Dell Precision M6500 notebook with Intel NIC.

Problem: when downloading e.g. updates, the FAST ist 30-times faster than SLOW, see attached.

Same mirrors,RJ45 cables changed twice, both attached to the same switch. So no real explanation.

Yesterday I did some iperf between the two clients.

For UDP, it does not matter, which is server and whicch is client:

20260118145326,SLOW,FAST,45678,1,0.0-30.0,3935190,1048952,0.025,0,2677,0.000,0

20260118145446,FAST,SLOW,45678,1,0.0-30.0,3935190,1048950,-nan,0,-1,-0.000,0

But for TCP direction matters:

20260118144505,SLOW,FAST,45678,1,0.0-30.0,3533963328,941434163

20260118144740,FAST,SLOW,45678,1,0.0-30.1,1690173504,449722645

-------------------------

First thought: RJ45 in SLOW machine is Realtek. But I have Realtek in other machines with same linux, always maxing out the bandwith possible. So I don't think it'S simply Realtek.

Why only TCP makes a difference? Is there offloading and that doesn't work properly in the SLOW machine? Maybe due to Coreboot @soundboard?

Any ideas how this difference in TCP-speed might be explainable?

:-)
Based on your iperf results and the specific hardware combination (Realtek + Coreboot), this is a classic case of TCP Offloading or Interrupt Throttling issues common with Realtek drivers on Linux.
Here is an analysis and potential solutions:
1. The "TCP vs. UDP" Clue: Hardware Offloading
The fact that UDP works fine but TCP is slow strongly points to TCP Segmentation Offload (TSO) or Generic Segmentation Offload (GSO). Realtek chips often have buggy implementations of these features in their firmware/drivers.
When these are enabled, the NIC tries to process TCP packets itself to save CPU. If it fails, it leads to packet retransmissions and massive slowdowns.
The Fix: Disable offloading on the SLOW machine:
bash
sudo ethtool -K <interface_name> tso off gso off gro off
Use code with caution.

Try running your iperf test again after this.
2. Driver Conflict: r8169 (Kernel) vs. r8168 (Vendor)
Most Linux distros use the open-source r8169 driver by default. While improved, it still struggles with certain Realtek revisions, especially regarding Receive Side Scaling (RSS).
The Fix: Install the official Realtek driver (often found as r8168-dkms in your package manager):
Ubuntu/Debian: sudo apt install r8168-dkms
Arch: sudo pacman -S r8168
Note: You may need to blacklist the r8169 driver in /etc/modprobe.d/.
3. Coreboot & ASPM (Power Management)
Coreboot sometimes doesn't initialize PCIe Active State Power Management (ASPM) correctly. If the Realtek chip enters a low-power state (L1) during the tiny gaps between TCP acknowledgments, the latency spikes and throughput collapses.
The Fix: Disable ASPM via the kernel command line:
Edit /etc/default/grub.
Add pcie_aspm=off to GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT.
Update grub (sudo update-grub) and reboot.
4. Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE)
Realtek NICS often have "Green Ethernet" (EEE) enabled. This can cause synchronization issues with certain switches, leading to the 30x speed difference you see.
The Fix: Disable EEE:
bash
sudo ethtool --set-eee <interface_name> eee off
Use code with caution.

Why the Dell (Intel NIC) is faster:
Intel NICs (like the one in your M6500) have superior hardware-level buffers and much more mature Linux drivers. They handle TCP window scaling and offloading far more gracefully than Realtek chips, which rely heavily on driver-side workarounds.
Recommended sequence for troubleshooting:
Test 1: Disable TSO/GSO with ethtool (Immediate effect, no reboot).
Test 2: Disable EEE.
Test 3: Switch from r8169 to r8168 driver.
Test 4: Disable pcie_aspm in GRUB.

hope can help you

@klevinsourd, that was my impression, explaining the thread title ;-)

Will try the suggestions and report back :-)
kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....

RE 1: Checked the status for offloading:

sudo ethtool --show-offload eth0
[sudo] password for root:
Features for eth0:
rx-checksumming: on
tx-checksumming: on
        tx-checksum-ipv4: on
        tx-checksum-ip-generic: off [fixed]
        tx-checksum-ipv6: on
        tx-checksum-fcoe-crc: off [fixed]
        tx-checksum-sctp: off [fixed]
scatter-gather: off
        tx-scatter-gather: off
        tx-scatter-gather-fraglist: off [fixed]
tcp-segmentation-offload: off
        tx-tcp-segmentation: off
        tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
        tx-tcp-mangleid-segmentation: off
        tx-tcp6-segmentation: off
        tx-tcp-accecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
generic-segmentation-offload: off [requested on]
generic-receive-offload: on
large-receive-offload: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-offload: on
tx-vlan-offload: on
ntuple-filters: off [fixed]
receive-hashing: off [fixed]
highdma: on [fixed]
rx-vlan-filter: off [fixed]
vlan-challenged: off [fixed]
tx-gso-robust: off [fixed]
tx-fcoe-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-gre-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-gre-csum-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-ipxip4-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-ipxip6-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-udp_tnl-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-udp_tnl-csum-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-gso-partial: off [fixed]
tx-tunnel-remcsum-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-sctp-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-esp-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-udp-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-gso-list: off [fixed]
tx-nocache-copy: off
loopback: off [fixed]
rx-fcs: off
rx-all: off
tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed]
l2-fwd-offload: off [fixed]
hw-tc-offload: off [fixed]
esp-hw-offload: off [fixed]
esp-tx-csum-hw-offload: off [fixed]
rx-udp_tunnel-port-offload: off [fixed]
tls-hw-tx-offload: off [fixed]
tls-hw-rx-offload: off [fixed]
rx-gro-hw: off [fixed]
tls-hw-record: off [fixed]
rx-gro-list: off
macsec-hw-offload: off [fixed]
rx-udp-gro-forwarding: off
hsr-tag-ins-offload: off [fixed]
hsr-tag-rm-offload: off [fixed]
hsr-fwd-offload: off [fixed]
hsr-dup-offload: off [fixed]

So GSO and TXO apparently off at the moment
kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....

It will be interesting if ASPM with coreboot is the culprit, as there is a very similar issue affecting a particular Protectli device: https://protectli.com/news/vp2440-coreboot-issue/

So that may not be limited to just Realtek NICs.  It could be an issue with coreboot handling of ASPM.

(EDIT: I saw that @chemlud's PCI link has ASPM disabled already, so am not sure if this still applies.  The Protectli work-around is to disable ASPM altogether at the OS level until a coreboot update is available.)

@OPNenthu Thanks for reading, yes, ASPM and offloading are apparently off the list at that point.

EEE (enabled, but apparently "inactive", see above) and the "wrong" driver (8169, which works perfectly on another Tumbleweed with old ATOM CPU with legacy BIOS and Realtek 8168 hardware, btw...) are on the list.

Not much left, apparently...
kind regards
chemlud
____
"The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity."
C.A.R. Hoare

felix eichhorns premium katzenfutter mit der extraportion energie

A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A router is not a switch - A rou....