Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
OPNsense Forum
»
English Forums
»
Virtual private networks
»
Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin (Read 3878 times)
RamSense
Hero Member
Posts: 592
Karma: 10
Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
«
on:
August 02, 2023, 07:00:13 am »
I have been running wireguard-go for quite some time with no problems at all. I use it as always on, on our mobile devices like the iPhones (iOs) (everywhere using dns/adguard home).
Now I have been trying to use the wireguard-kernel version. At first it works flawlessly. But after some time (after the mobile device / iphone have not been used for some time / 10 mins, and start using again) the vpn connection is still there, but there is no data, no internet data. Seems like the tunnel stalls..
I found out that when configuring Endpoints - Keepalive Interval set at 25, the wireguard-kernel keeps working (just like the go version).
Now I wonder, why is it I have to add a keepalive in the kernel version? Is this a bug? The go version has, i think, the default setting of Keepalive Interval = 0, but i can not enter 0 in the endpoint config.
If the only solution is using a Keepalive Interval, what is the best interval setting to use? e.g. 25 or other number?
Others having this issue also? Thanks for the help!
Logged
tiermutter
Hero Member
Posts: 1083
Karma: 59
Re: Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
«
Reply #1 on:
August 02, 2023, 08:40:36 am »
Using wg kmod for a longer time now, I have no such issues on Android devices, keepalive is not configured.
But I have a similiar issue on Windows. However, I cannot say if this is since kmod and the problem only occurs when connection is established on WAN IPv6, not when established on LTE IPv4. I assume this is a v6 connectivity issue on client side as connection then cannot be re-established for a while, but I will give it a try with setting keepalive.
Logged
i am not an expert... just trying to help...
RamSense
Hero Member
Posts: 592
Karma: 10
Re: Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
«
Reply #2 on:
August 02, 2023, 09:12:08 am »
thanks for the reply and testing. I have both ipv4 and ipv6 configured. I have not checked if it is only ipv6.
I think it is both because I notice it back at home (on wifi with wireguard on) also and there I see the device connected to wireguard ipv4. Never saw this with the go version.
Interested to hear about your testing results.
Logged
tiermutter
Hero Member
Posts: 1083
Karma: 59
Re: Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
«
Reply #3 on:
August 07, 2023, 11:16:49 am »
Since I have configured PersistentKeepalive = 25 on Windows the problem did not occur again...
But as said, I am not sure if the problem occured since I changed to kmod.
However, I will stay with this setting
Logged
i am not an expert... just trying to help...
RamSense
Hero Member
Posts: 592
Karma: 10
Re: Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
«
Reply #4 on:
August 07, 2023, 01:40:25 pm »
Thank you for testing also. My WireGuard stays up and running with KeepAlive 25. I did some google search and found more mentions of this 25 setting, but maybe other values are possible. I Don’t know what the best practice is, but I will keep 25 for now.
Logged
CJ
Hero Member
Posts: 832
Karma: 29
Re: Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
«
Reply #5 on:
August 07, 2023, 04:41:38 pm »
There is a bug which is causing the connection to timeout and be closed and that is why the keepalive 25 is required.
I'm not sure what the status of it is as I haven't looked into this in quite some time.
Logged
Have Answer, Will Blog
RamSense
Hero Member
Posts: 592
Karma: 10
Re: Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
«
Reply #6 on:
August 07, 2023, 06:26:24 pm »
CJ thanks for the info and confirmation that the 25 is the way to go for now.
Logged
crlt
Newbie
Posts: 6
Karma: 1
Re: Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin
«
Reply #7 on:
December 27, 2023, 06:18:48 am »
I have not had luck with any of the suggestions above to fix the issue on Android.
I did not have this issue while running 23.1 (and prior releases) with Wireguard-go but If I installed Wireguard-kernel I did have the issue. Since upgrading to 23.7, I get the issue whether I use Wireguard-go or Wireguard-Kernel. I will probably start another thread if there isn't one already.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
OPNsense Forum
»
English Forums
»
Virtual private networks
»
Wireguard-go VS Wireguard-kernel plugin