Topics

Dumb question, but where would one report a dashboard widget issue?

The new tailscale dashboard widget always shows Exit Node "No", even if Exit Node is configured and working.


Jason

I changed around my hardware when moving to 22.1.

Now I have 1 10Gb connection.

LAN - untagged/parent interface
IoT1 - vlan2
IoT2 - vlan3
...

I only want to monitor LAN and IoT1 in Sensei (purely to work around the Sensei device count license restrictions).

Is there away to monitor the parent and EXCLUDE/NOT MONITOR some of the child vlans? Or is it always going to count devices on all child vlans no matter what if you incluide the parent?

If the latter, I will definitely go above 100 devices due to many devices on my IoT2 vlan.

My subscription ends 11/28, so I thought I would ask one last time...

Are there any plans on adding more policies for the Home license?

If not, then I won't renew. With a main, guest, and IoT vlan + adult vs kid policy needs, I simply can't do what I need in only 3 policies. I expect many other home users that separate IoT, main, and Guest traffic are in the same situation.

Thanks,
Jason

What is the rational for only letting Home users have 2 configurable profiles? Seems like an odd limitation, that very much limits how I can use the product.

I don't want/need 100 policies, but something like 5 sure would go a long way towards being able to limit things the way I want to... I really need 2 different kid profiles, a guest profile, an adult profile, and the default.

Anyway, consider it a feature request / wish list item.

Any possibility that SV would consider relaxing/expanding the 100 device limit for HOME users?

I am a home user, and already have >100 IPs (maybe 115-120 right now) between my LAN and IoT networks.

I have a ton of IoT devices - 80+ between TVs, TiVos, XBOXes, a bunch of Google Home devices, some VMs, Home Automation hubs, etc - seems like EVERYTHING has an IP address adn connection these days.

But even on the non-IoT side there are a bunch of IPs between phones, tablets, watches, UniFi APs/Switches, VMs, and desktops.

It all adds up to the fact that I can't stay under 100 and still monitor everything I want to.

In a perfect world I wouldn't have to further segment my IoT devices to try and stay under the artificial 100 device limit. Please consider this!

Or if not that, then at least add thew ability to ignore/exclude specific IPs in a subnet and have those not count towards the licensing count (I looked and I don't see anything like that on your short or long term road maps). Then at least I could exclude the lesser device and still analyze the traffic on some of the less trusted IoT devices.

Thanks for your consideration.