1
17.7 Legacy Series / Re: Bridging vlans - 17.7
« on: April 28, 2018, 11:20:33 am »
Anyone else offering any other ideas?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
17.7 Legacy Series / Re: Bridging vlans - 17.7
« on: April 24, 2018, 08:47:03 pm »
attaching an image just to be clear what i am saying
3
17.7 Legacy Series / Bridging vlans - 17.7
« on: April 20, 2018, 08:39:23 pm »
Hello
I would like to get some help regarding a little problem i am facing. I create bridge0 and assign 2 interfaces igb6 and igb7 to it. Connecting 2 systems to these ports and they are able to ping each other (both of 10.10.10.0/24 series for testing).
Next i create vlan_igb5 with parent interface igb5 and vlan_igb6 with parent igb6. Remove parent interfaces from bridge0 and assign vlans created above to the bridge, i can't seem to ping no matter what. Can anyone please guide what is wrong?
P.s: created rules for parents as well as bridge and vlans allowing all traffic.
Also tcpdump shows nothing whatsoever for bridge as well as vlans after being assigned to bridge.
I would like to get some help regarding a little problem i am facing. I create bridge0 and assign 2 interfaces igb6 and igb7 to it. Connecting 2 systems to these ports and they are able to ping each other (both of 10.10.10.0/24 series for testing).
Next i create vlan_igb5 with parent interface igb5 and vlan_igb6 with parent igb6. Remove parent interfaces from bridge0 and assign vlans created above to the bridge, i can't seem to ping no matter what. Can anyone please guide what is wrong?
P.s: created rules for parents as well as bridge and vlans allowing all traffic.
Also tcpdump shows nothing whatsoever for bridge as well as vlans after being assigned to bridge.
5
Hardware and Performance / Re: aes 256 performance
« on: February 04, 2018, 08:00:28 am »
performance at the cost of security not the purpose 
6
Hardware and Performance / Re: aes 256 performance
« on: February 03, 2018, 09:58:11 am »
Apologies for not sharing topology.
Since this is out of curiosity more than anything, i have connected 2 firewalls back to back . Figure is attached.
VPN details shared already. Iperf server is hosted on 192.168.2.2, client from 192.168.3.2. Both PCs running windows 7
Since this is out of curiosity more than anything, i have connected 2 firewalls back to back . Figure is attached.
VPN details shared already. Iperf server is hosted on 192.168.2.2, client from 192.168.3.2. Both PCs running windows 7
7
Hardware and Performance / aes 256 performance
« on: February 02, 2018, 12:09:35 pm »
Hello
Have lanner 8759. Testing out aes 256 performance
config at both ends:
Mode: MAin
P1 protocol: aes 256 and sha1
p2 protocol: esp and sha1
I am getting throughput of about 420 Mbps (measured through iperf)
I was wondering if this is good on a xeon e3-1275 processor?
Also it supports aes ni, does that get enabled by default or has to be enabled via bios?
Lastly are there any tunables that i can play around with to increase performance since my cpu utilization hardly gets upto 15%?
Have lanner 8759. Testing out aes 256 performance
config at both ends:
Mode: MAin
P1 protocol: aes 256 and sha1
p2 protocol: esp and sha1
I am getting throughput of about 420 Mbps (measured through iperf)
I was wondering if this is good on a xeon e3-1275 processor?
Also it supports aes ni, does that get enabled by default or has to be enabled via bios?
Lastly are there any tunables that i can play around with to increase performance since my cpu utilization hardly gets upto 15%?
8
General Discussion / Re: MAx supported NICs
« on: February 02, 2018, 11:42:23 am »
igb0 to igb10 with one named em0
will share dmesg soon
will share dmesg soon
9
General Discussion / MAx supported NICs
« on: February 02, 2018, 07:05:07 am »
Hello
I am running v 17.1. My hardware has 8 igb ports which run fine. Somewhere i found 8x Gigabit PCIe NIC card. Now my system should typically show 16 NICs but it only shows 12. ANy ideas what might be causing this?
I am running v 17.1. My hardware has 8 igb ports which run fine. Somewhere i found 8x Gigabit PCIe NIC card. Now my system should typically show 16 NICs but it only shows 12. ANy ideas what might be causing this?
10
Development and Code Review / Re: how to develop opnsense iso
« on: October 11, 2017, 07:23:29 am »We have docs for this... https://github.com/opnsense/tools#advanced-package-buildsThanks for the guide franco, things much clear now.
Please refer to specific sections of the document if you have trouble with them.
Cheers,
Franco
11
Development and Code Review / Re: how to develop opnsense iso
« on: October 09, 2017, 09:09:26 am »
where are the dowloaded port files saved? i have checked ports folder but the disfile folder doesnt exist. also how can i resume an old image development process? any help will be appreciated
12
Development and Code Review / Re: how to develop opnsense iso
« on: September 29, 2017, 07:02:52 am »Core dependencies:Thanks fabian. Its a great start
https://github.com/opnsense/core/blob/master/Makefile#L74-L134
Ports to build:
https://github.com/opnsense/tools/blob/master/config/17.7/ports.conf
13
Development and Code Review / Re: how to develop opnsense iso
« on: September 28, 2017, 08:50:28 am »
Thanks for replying ranco, as i understand the core contains gui components. Or does it contain the list/actual packages too that are built during compilation process?
14
Development and Code Review / how to develop opnsense iso
« on: September 27, 2017, 07:39:40 pm »
Hello
I have seen instructions on github page regarding how to build image. While i have not tried it yet, i would like to know if it is possible to build image with selected packages e.g we dont need dhcp v6. Few other packages can be removed this way. Is there any way to develop such custom image?
I have seen instructions on github page regarding how to build image. While i have not tried it yet, i would like to know if it is possible to build image with selected packages e.g we dont need dhcp v6. Few other packages can be removed this way. Is there any way to develop such custom image?
15
General Discussion / route based vpn?
« on: November 19, 2015, 06:35:06 pm »
can anyone please guide me if it is possible to create route based ipsec tunnel in opnsense? if so whats the procedure? I shall be grateful
Pages: [1] 2