Messages

Are they even the same laptop model? What percentage is the difference observed?

It should be fixed with

# opnsense-patch https://github.com/opnsense/core/commit/6e3cda346c858d0b070b77439bdd322d6a0db7c1

Assuming the other patch Franco mentioned wasn't reverted.

We still need a confirmation on Stephans patch so we can safely hotfix.


Cheers,
Franco

LGTM

No graph/ table seems to display any data.

Could this be it?
https://github.com/opnsense/core/commit/b9a65b152eb155db4603b9318c99c599466b5d95

Unfortunately not. But I will have a look...

If he actually ships anything I will be more than surprised.

1) His LinkedIn very clearly states that nfSensei started when he left his last job on December of 2025, which is more believable than 2024 since the domain was registered late January 2026.

2) The guy has spent the last 15 years as a generic IT guy in marketing organizations. To the best of my knowledge without any coding projects on the side.

3) The AI coded site has the most nonsensical AI generated content I have read in years.

4) How can one have an open source project without sharing the source in any way? Especially in the beginning, feedback is very important.

I am almost sure AI can do this for you. Try it out.

But anyway, it's being developed since 2004.

Hahaha, no it isn't... If he actually started on January, I would be surprised.

The only reason we know of the project is that Ullrich is one of the pfsense cofounders. Other than that, this is a very unserious situation in my humble opinion.

OPNsense includes the Hagezi Gambling blocklist under the unbound blocklists. Start there, and you can also use any other provider you prefer.

Nope, you are good to go.

I am not sure about this one, so I am posting it here. I think I do see a higher RAM-usage. But I have no historical data and that VM has only 1 Gig of RAM to begin with.
Right now, after a reboot, it looks okayish. Maybe others have better data.

 

Proxmox?

I am running UFS.

It appears that the "cache" metric no longer exists in the memory line of the top command. "Laundry" exists in place of "cache," and it shows a non-zero value.

If the "System memory" in "Reporting Health" follows the memory metrics used by the top command, I believe it would be better to eliminate "cache" and introduce "laundry."

Is it not possible to change the cache display, given the need to maintain compatibility with past data?

In case you want to try it: opnsense-core -a sopex 5bfd77c

Otherwise it will be in some following release.
https://github.com/opnsense/core/commit/5bfd77cff2fcaf995db88cc5d4bef1eb070c95d7

The design language of the widget is completely different from rest of the project.

That being said it's very space efficient and you can very easily identify what is enabled and what disabled.

It's a combination of the virtualized host you are using and the way FreeBSD assigns interfaces.

Make sure "Prevent interface removal" is ticked on all your interfaces.

Also, we are at 26.1.11 now :)

Great guide, as always!

Was it working before? 26.1.9? Or we don't know?