Messages

Are any plans in the documentation to include as scenario where DNSMasq is alone or it is not in best practices?

Hi guys,
I would like an opinion on the best way. I have AdGuard Home plugin (port 53) where all requests passing on this. Currently I have Unbound+ISC for DNS DHCP with static entries and overrides mostly for most of home and IOT devices and thinking to move to DNSMasq where to be fair I feel more conformable (from OpenWRT times). My question is: having this setup (couple static DNS entries and/or DHCP entries, some overrides, no DoH or blacklists) do I need Unbound?

Hi to all,

I have the following scenario (which was working before migration to opnsense).
I have install wireguard in a Raspberry PI in my mom flat to access the network for troubleshooting (but also for VPN as it is in different country). So from my PC I have wireguard client, I was started the interface wg0 and I was able to do ssh to Raspberry PI or wherever inside the other network.

Now this scenario it is not working anymore after migration from OpenWRT to Opnsense and I'm sure that I'm missing something in the setup of Opnsense (NAT? FW? both?). Can someone give some help?
thx

I had it like this but my scope is to have a least as possible devices + have the router the last device running, trying to reduce load by shutdown fast all other devices are connected to the UPS.
I have a PI Zero W if in the end, it is a pain in the...

Hello to all,

I would like to ask if there is any way (or plans) to extend the configuration of NUT plugin. In details, I have a UPS USB based attached to a router in standalone setup and I want to add more users because of Home Assistant plugin and also other devices which as netclients (they have to shutdown earlier before router). I can add users in the upsd.users but as it is written, changes will be overwritten (which I confirmed it). Is there any other way to have them more permanent?

Same applies for upsmon settings but I'm more interested for users.