Messages

1

23.7 Legacy Series / Re: kern.maxfiles limit exceeded by uid 0, please see tuning(7)

« on: November 08, 2024, 07:19:45 pm »

same here.  pretty bad as all services down but our internet.  vpn halted.  rebooting now to fix,  but midday and distruptive.  kinda seems related to zenarmor as i was seeing some logs from there.   i couldnt even log into opnsense locally it was locking login.   hard power cycle fixed

2

24.7 Production Series / Re: New Dashboard

« on: August 07, 2024, 08:57:06 pm »

Ok, you can open tickets on GitHub plugins for the individual themes.


Cheers,
Franco

i found one that works .   Cicada
 thx

3

24.7 Production Series / Re: New Dashboard

« on: August 07, 2024, 08:00:37 pm »

There are several dark theme plugins to choose from.

Whenever we get to revamping the default theme it will probably also include a dark mode sibling....


Cheers,
Franco

ive tried 2 diff themes and the interface goes dark but not the widgets.  the widgets are bright white.  only way to get dark ive found is use dark reader.

4

24.7 Production Series / Re: New Dashboard

« on: August 07, 2024, 05:42:44 pm »

will there be a dark mode included? i prefer not to have to use a browser plugin to make this dashboard page not blind me.  default its not the greatest

5

Virtual private networks / Re: Questions to Migrate OpenVPN Servers legacy to Instances New

« on: February 05, 2024, 12:06:58 am »

im in kinda same boat.
i deleted my old server openvpn.  and in the menus it still say legacy...  why does it show legacy in menus.  how do i get it to let me setup non legacy?  sorry to hijack your thread,  but once i get that figured out ill play with new settings to help you as well.

6

Hardware and Performance / Re: Any issues with i210 / i211 & i350 on OPNSense 20.x ?

« on: April 15, 2023, 10:57:11 pm »

PS C:\Program Files\Hrping> .\hrping.exe 192.168.2.1 -t
This is hrPING v5.07.1149 by cFos Software GmbH -- http://www.cfos.de

Source address is 192.168.2.224; using ICMP echo-request, ID=246f
Pinging 192.168.2.1 [192.168.2.1]
with 32 bytes data (60 bytes IP):

setsockopt IP_HDRINCL failed: Error 10013: An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions.
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0001 TTL=64 ID=64c9 time=0.454ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0002 TTL=64 ID=0c66 time=0.392ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0003 TTL=64 ID=13b9 time=0.425ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0004 TTL=64 ID=077d time=0.402ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0005 TTL=64 ID=8630 time=0.408ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0006 TTL=64 ID=60d1 time=0.346ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0007 TTL=64 ID=409c time=0.437ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0008 TTL=64 ID=cf86 time=0.425ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0009 TTL=64 ID=4313 time=0.449ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000a TTL=64 ID=e4f0 time=0.422ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000b TTL=64 ID=8098 time=0.384ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000c TTL=64 ID=f150 time=0.409ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000d TTL=64 ID=c33f time=0.337ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000e TTL=64 ID=0857 time=0.428ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000f TTL=64 ID=3721 time=0.434ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0010 TTL=64 ID=eac0 time=0.401ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0011 TTL=64 ID=2a48 time=0.486ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0012 TTL=64 ID=c82b time=0.413ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0013 TTL=64 ID=c2b5 time=0.369ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0014 TTL=64 ID=4600 time=0.409ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0015 TTL=64 ID=d4bb time=0.403ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0016 TTL=64 ID=18d3 time=0.400ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0017 TTL=64 ID=43d3 time=0.402ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0018 TTL=64 ID=8b08 time=0.426ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0019 TTL=64 ID=d940 time=0.299ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=001a TTL=64 ID=72ac time=0.366ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=001b TTL=64 ID=7d4c time=0.405ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=001c TTL=64 ID=8ac4 time=0.407ms
[Aborting...]

Packets: sent=28, rcvd=28, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 13.501999 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 0.299 / 0.404 / 0.486 / 0.036
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.124, rcvd=0.124
PS C:\Program Files\Hrping> .\hrping.exe 192.168.2.1 -t
This is hrPING v5.07.1149 by cFos Software GmbH -- http://www.cfos.de

Source address is 192.168.2.224; using ICMP echo-request, ID=884c
Pinging 192.168.2.1 [192.168.2.1]
with 32 bytes data (60 bytes IP):

setsockopt IP_HDRINCL failed: Error 10013: An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions.
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0001 TTL=64 ID=8790 time=0.275ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0002 TTL=64 ID=073c time=0.263ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0003 TTL=64 ID=f4b9 time=0.297ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0004 TTL=64 ID=eeaa time=0.274ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0005 TTL=64 ID=4512 time=0.203ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0006 TTL=64 ID=a8e4 time=0.273ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0007 TTL=64 ID=ae4a time=0.284ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0008 TTL=64 ID=ab11 time=0.255ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0009 TTL=64 ID=c840 time=0.291ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000a TTL=64 ID=0ef1 time=0.261ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000b TTL=64 ID=8e7a time=0.266ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000c TTL=64 ID=a4ff time=0.246ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000d TTL=64 ID=6a43 time=0.247ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000e TTL=64 ID=631b time=0.256ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=000f TTL=64 ID=9ca2 time=0.284ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0010 TTL=64 ID=f874 time=0.242ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0011 TTL=64 ID=3b3b time=0.234ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0012 TTL=64 ID=9937 time=0.279ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0013 TTL=64 ID=4fc9 time=0.240ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0014 TTL=64 ID=4153 time=0.287ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0015 TTL=64 ID=9ceb time=0.270ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0016 TTL=64 ID=400e time=0.301ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0017 TTL=64 ID=8c82 time=0.273ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0018 TTL=64 ID=2109 time=0.257ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=0019 TTL=64 ID=36ff time=0.229ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=001a TTL=64 ID=afb6 time=0.281ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=001b TTL=64 ID=1633 time=0.263ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=001c TTL=64 ID=5aec time=0.222ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=001d TTL=64 ID=c85b time=0.279ms
From 192.168.2.1: bytes=60 seq=001e TTL=64 ID=2d6d time=0.311ms
[Aborting...]

Packets: sent=30, rcvd=30, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 14.514310 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 0.203 / 0.264 / 0.311 / 0.024
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.124, rcvd=0.124
PS C:\Program Files\Hrping>

Wanted to share my findings.  changed from a qotom 6 port i211 to a supermicro x11 with 4 i210 ports.  Red is the i211.
green is i210

pretty much proves the i210 is better.  this test was done with the exact same opnsense cfg and done within 1 hour of each other.  i210 more consistent and lower latency.

the x11 does have a faster processor,  but shouldnt have anything to do with this as i could hit 1gbps speeds without hitting 50% cpu on the qotom.