Best regards from VPN :) I created new instance and removed the old one. I supposed the problem was in Interface settings. Anyway it works!
Thank you for help, lesson and patience!
Thank you for help, lesson and patience!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts Menu wg1 2022-10-21T11:08:53 192.168.20.21:33888 192.168.20.1:53 udp Default deny / state violation rule
wg1 2022-10-21T11:08:53 192.168.20.21:64906 192.168.20.1:53 udp Default deny / state violation rule
wg1 2022-10-21T11:08:53 192.168.20.21:6700 192.168.20.1:53 udp Default deny / state violation rule
wg1 2022-10-21T11:08:42 192.168.20.21:12967 192.168.20.1:53 udp Default deny / state violation rule
wg1 2022-10-21T11:08:33 192.168.20.21:45439 192.168.20.1:53 udp Default deny / state violation rule
QuoteI've created this rule and deactivated any else. Now I receive may DNS and ICMP blocks.
I suggest to clean up the FW rules, maybe start with one rule "allow WG to any" as you are doing nothing else with those rules for the only two clients that can be connected to WG interface. If you need to block something, place those block rules before "allow any", everything first match.
Quote from: tiermutter on October 21, 2022, 06:33:26 AMI tried with 0.0.0.0/1, 128.0.0.0/1 Unfortunately it doesn't work, on SURFACE and SAMSUNG (Android) the same behavior.
For Windows client use allowed IPs / erlaubte IPs ) = 0.0.0.0/1, 128.0.0.0/1 as Windows don´t like to change the default route 0.0.0.0/0
Quote from: tiermutter on October 21, 2022, 06:28:54 AM1. This is intentional - I followed the manual on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYFNa_zpeII . It is explained in about 14''. It works in my config also in another interfaces. It is wrong configuration or only another way to block traffic between interfaces and allow internet?
The firewall rules... is this WG interface? The rules looks pretty weird...
1. The "WG allow internet" rule is last match, causing that "reject private networks" will be hit before
2. "allow S21" and "allow surface" rule´s source is a host IP, but you´re using /24 instead of /32 (but should not be the problem)
3. there are two DNS rules. Why? 192.168.10.1 is "this firewall" / the sense´s LAN IP, correct? Use the sense´s WG IP instead (192.168.20.1 I guess)
This are the rules for my WG (Roadwarrior) interface for reference: