Messages

I'm trying to edit the poll time for a service configured in monit, according to my needs but if I enter an integer (for cycles) Monit will not save and the button Apply will never disappear and monit will be stuck, If I try to enter a cron syntax for every 30 minutes (*/30 * * * *) it seems that does not support the step characther (/).
This is what the help for poll time says: Set the service poll time. Either as a number of cycles "NUMBER CYCLES" or Cron-style "* 8-19 * * 1-5". So an integer for number of cycles should be supportes, since according to monit documentation a cycles is every 2 minutes, 15 should be my integer but Monit does not restart.

I check the script and just update the pf tables. Maybe that frequency is useful in scenario where you have HA enabled and want to be sure the 2 system are constantly aligned (just supposing, sorry if wrong).

Do you have Netflow v9 enabled? I saw this happening and from other comment being related to this. I shifted to v5 (more than enough for OPN) and is really almost disappearing or lot less CPU spike. Hope this help.

 I have 2 gateway, one DSL (GW1) and one 4G (GW2) The first one have priority 1 and monitor IP 8.8.8.8, the second have priority 100 and monitor IP 8.8.4.4.  I if test failover manually disabling the main gateway GW1, than it switch to GW2 autotomatically and and re-enabling GW1 switch the active gateway to GW1 and all works.
If I physically disconnect the cable from GW1, than automatically switch correctly to GW2, but when I reconnect the cable, even if I can ping the gateway GW1 IP from any computer, in OPN the Main gateway GW1 remain OFFLINE, until I manually click again to enable manually. Any help?

There is a way to reset the Traffic Shaper statistic displayed in the "status" page under Firewall other than restart the device?
Thanks.

I think I fixed this, disabling in bios SATA Gen3 and setting it as SATA gen 2

Just installed OPNSense, No rule in the firewall. But iperf3 with and without firewall is showing big difference. Even without firewall seems anyway not so great since I have a 1Gb interface. Other system running different flavor shows aroun 950Mbit.
Here is OPNSense with Firewall active:
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   513 MBytes   430 Mbits/sec                  sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   513 MBytes   430 Mbits/sec                  receiver
Ad without.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   919 MBytes   771 Mbits/sec                  sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   919 MBytes   770 Mbits/sec                  receiver

Any suggestion or is the system this slow? I was willing to applying to a 1Gb fiber but...is clearly not enough.

is possbile to reduce the delay waiting for options input at boot? Is by default set to 3 sec but I want the boot to be the fastest in case of power failure...

New to OPNsense truing to migrate from another solution. What really surprise me is that on exact same kind of hw device where I have other linux distro with no problem, OPNsense sometime stop at boot with
Mounting from ufs/dev/gpt/rootfs failed with error 19
If I reboot most of the time it goes ok, but sometime, more frequently after a full system shoutdowm and power off it happen.
This do not seems reliable in a production enviroment, especially becouse the syetem have to run without a keybord.
I have tried adding boot delay as a plugin, as an option in tunables, add ahci hint as I saw in another post but no, still random issue. This is an ahci ssd. Any help?

Hello, I'm new to OPNSense. Coming from another solution where I was using QoS. In OPN seems a little different.
My question is about the concept of Pipe. Assuming I want to create priority and "reserved" bandwidth for a VoIP Class but also I want this bandwidth to be avaiable for the other traffic when there is no Voip traffic. Should I create a Pipe or Queues? Reading the documentation on the web site seems that if a pipe is created you need to create a pipe for the remaining traffic too, that let me deduct that this will reduce the amount of traffic even if the pipe is not used. Am I wrong? What 's the best option to achieve my scenario?