Can this combined rule be separated into two, one for a state validation failure, and a separate one for Default Deny?
Rationale: When I rebuilt our Firewall over the Christmas break, there were a number of anomalies as I tried to get rules working correctly. It was a significant impediment not knowing whether traffic was passed or blocked because my rules were incorrect, or simply because I had cleared states to ensure that the rules would be applied after changing them.
Even now, with everything working, I see many periodic "Default deny / state violation rule" events logged continuously from sources to targets that should be passed, and appear to be working just fine. So I assume that for some reason the state was invalid... but I don't know.
I assume without confidence, because, well, what else could it be? And that's my point; rules are confusing enough without having ambiguity in the default rules.
Rationale: When I rebuilt our Firewall over the Christmas break, there were a number of anomalies as I tried to get rules working correctly. It was a significant impediment not knowing whether traffic was passed or blocked because my rules were incorrect, or simply because I had cleared states to ensure that the rules would be applied after changing them.
Even now, with everything working, I see many periodic "Default deny / state violation rule" events logged continuously from sources to targets that should be passed, and appear to be working just fine. So I assume that for some reason the state was invalid... but I don't know.
I assume without confidence, because, well, what else could it be? And that's my point; rules are confusing enough without having ambiguity in the default rules.