1
Hardware and Performance / Re: Consumption and network adapter
« on: April 05, 2018, 12:25:43 pm »
For energy consumption, it reassures me.
I thought a consumption close to 100W for built solutions.
In the end, it's not nearly as energizing as the Quotom's box given the extra CPU power.
This remains reasonable for me.
I saw the Qotom's box, but I'm afraid of being CPU limited.
The form factor does not really matter to me, there are small boxes now.
I'm not very fanless, heat is the enemy of electronics.
And I'm not sure that we can have the full power of the CPU in time without it being forced to slow down because of the limitations of the envellope thermal.
I read that some of the users of boxs use USB fans to cool their boxes, it's quite ironic.
But for basic use, I think it's still a good solution.
For NICs, I read the datasheet to see these offloads even though I am far from understanding everything.
I thought a consumption close to 100W for built solutions.
In the end, it's not nearly as energizing as the Quotom's box given the extra CPU power.
This remains reasonable for me.
I saw the Qotom's box, but I'm afraid of being CPU limited.
The form factor does not really matter to me, there are small boxes now.
I'm not very fanless, heat is the enemy of electronics.
And I'm not sure that we can have the full power of the CPU in time without it being forced to slow down because of the limitations of the envellope thermal.
I read that some of the users of boxs use USB fans to cool their boxes, it's quite ironic.
But for basic use, I think it's still a good solution.
For NICs, I read the datasheet to see these offloads even though I am far from understanding everything.