1
17.1 Legacy Series / Re: Jails and privilege isolation
« on: July 25, 2017, 09:02:17 pm »
How would a jail work on the edge with an IDS/IPS? Jails are virtual instances which means your pulling away from bare metal. Nice in theory and practice on all the other services you mentioned but an IDS/IPS needs the absolute raw packet to be effect at filtering. Which is a tiny part of the reason checksums are disabled on the NIC you host the listening interface on. Running unprivileged would be amazing as IDS exploits while few and far between do exist it would be nice to have at least a simple first step. No idea how to even start when it requires control over network devices which is reserved most times for OS system level.
There are very small changes to some packets when running as a VM vs bare metal from a few test I've done over the years. Not a huge amount but the same exploit to both machines have tiny difference on some packets which has a potential to be used by people far smarter then me. Trust me a monkey with a rusty nail is pretty close comparison.
ZFS on firewall... I love ZFS. Long live the ZFS NAS! I hate ZFS pre-req's. Last thing anyone wants is a small appliance with memory being taken up for storage when it should be used for session states and IDS/IPS rules. I don't know about you but having a small appliance or machine with 2GB ram is enough for 25 devices at home to all talk with no problems that's with torrents running. Now if the installer detects the device it's being added on has 32+GB ram you have my support. At that point reporting actually matters and you have a much larger user base behind to protect and worry about.
For the web interface part I'm all ears, can you make it happen? Hey smart dev's, OP needs to start write a little code don't you think :-).
There are very small changes to some packets when running as a VM vs bare metal from a few test I've done over the years. Not a huge amount but the same exploit to both machines have tiny difference on some packets which has a potential to be used by people far smarter then me. Trust me a monkey with a rusty nail is pretty close comparison.
ZFS on firewall... I love ZFS. Long live the ZFS NAS! I hate ZFS pre-req's. Last thing anyone wants is a small appliance with memory being taken up for storage when it should be used for session states and IDS/IPS rules. I don't know about you but having a small appliance or machine with 2GB ram is enough for 25 devices at home to all talk with no problems that's with torrents running. Now if the installer detects the device it's being added on has 32+GB ram you have my support. At that point reporting actually matters and you have a much larger user base behind to protect and worry about.
For the web interface part I'm all ears, can you make it happen? Hey smart dev's, OP needs to start write a little code don't you think :-).