Show Posts
1
16.7 Legacy Series / Re: [Question] Quagga/BIRD support on upcoming release
« on: February 07, 2017, 10:59:38 pm »
As mentioned by others, OSPF/BGP gui would be welcome, at least for basic configuration.
I'm using QUAGGA (BGP) right now with OPN and it works great, but there are some features that would be nice to have, even without the gui configuration part.
For example, the System/Routes/status page shows BGP routes with the Flag "UG1", static routes with "UGS", etc. This makes it hard to read where the routes are coming from and from what routing protocol. Would it be possible to use standardish flags ? ( Cisco example; L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, B - BGP ...)
Also a small help box directly on that page for the flags would be nice
it took me a while to find it in the docs.
Back to GUI, if all that is needed for a basic GUI is a site for testing and development, i can obviously and happily test it any time for most routing protocols.
I'm using QUAGGA (BGP) right now with OPN and it works great, but there are some features that would be nice to have, even without the gui configuration part.
For example, the System/Routes/status page shows BGP routes with the Flag "UG1", static routes with "UGS", etc. This makes it hard to read where the routes are coming from and from what routing protocol. Would it be possible to use standardish flags ? ( Cisco example; L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, B - BGP ...)
Also a small help box directly on that page for the flags would be nice
it took me a while to find it in the docs.Back to GUI, if all that is needed for a basic GUI is a site for testing and development, i can obviously and happily test it any time for most routing protocols.