1
General Discussion / Re: Source NAT over ipsec VPN
« on: May 25, 2016, 06:41:53 pm »
After reading through the link in github, that sounds exactly like the issue. Any semi-enterprise class firewall should be able to do this (it's a pretty standard feature). But after reading the link through it sounds like it does NOT and it won't be fixed anytime soon. Correct?
I know this is OPNSense, but I thought it was built on the same freeBSD that pfsense is and I understood it worked in pfsense, which doesn't quite make sense based on the post (I can't say I'm a linux expert and don't claim to be, but the github post states it's an issue with freeDSD)
This is my first real use of open source firewall stuff, other than playing with them in a VMWare environment, but this is the first time I've actually put one out there to use. This seems like kind of a deal breaker for any firewall/VPN appliance to not be able to do this.
I admit none of the dlink/netgear type of appliances do this (or did anyway when I looked at them a while back) but given that the current open source FW stuff out there is supposed to be close to enterprise capability....
Is there an easy workaround?
Thanks for the response.
I know this is OPNSense, but I thought it was built on the same freeBSD that pfsense is and I understood it worked in pfsense, which doesn't quite make sense based on the post (I can't say I'm a linux expert and don't claim to be, but the github post states it's an issue with freeDSD)
This is my first real use of open source firewall stuff, other than playing with them in a VMWare environment, but this is the first time I've actually put one out there to use. This seems like kind of a deal breaker for any firewall/VPN appliance to not be able to do this.
I admit none of the dlink/netgear type of appliances do this (or did anyway when I looked at them a while back) but given that the current open source FW stuff out there is supposed to be close to enterprise capability....
Is there an easy workaround?
Thanks for the response.