Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
OPNsense Forum
»
English Forums
»
24.1 Legacy Series
»
Traffic shaping makes bufferbloat score worse
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Traffic shaping makes bufferbloat score worse (Read 2551 times)
beneix
Newbie
Posts: 49
Karma: 3
Traffic shaping makes bufferbloat score worse
«
on:
February 02, 2024, 12:53:30 pm »
Ï used to have an XDSL connection that meant I had to use QoS to ensure my videoconferencing worked OK. When we were moved to fibre I just updated the bandwidth and quantum numbers in the traffic shaper settings and thought nothing more about it. Because of the much faster connection, things mostly work OK.
Then I decided to run a bufferbloat test and was surprised to see I only got a "C" rating from
https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat
. I connected via Ethernet directly to the OPNSense router and ran the test again - same result. Then I tried turning traffic shaping off and now I got a rating of "A". This puzzles me - why does the traffic shaping now make bufferbloat
worse
on my fibre connection, when it used to make things
better
on the XDSL connection?
My traffic shaping settings are:
Pipes
Down
Bandwidth 430 Mbps
CoDel not enabled
(FQ-)CoDel ECN enabled
FQ-CoDel quantum 1290
Up
Bandwidth 290 Mbps
CoDel not enabled
(FQ-)CoDel ECN enabled
Queues
Down
Weight 100
mask destination
(FQ-)CoDel ECN enabled
Up
Weight 100
mask source
(FQ-)CoDel ECN enabled
Rules
Down
Interface WAN
Protocol ip
Source any
Src-port any
Destination 192.168.2.0/24 (the OPNSense is 192.168.2.0 and hands out DHCP addresses 192.168.2.1-255)
Direction both
Target download queue
Up
Interface WAN
Protocol ip
Source 192.168.2.0/24
Src-port any
Destination any
Direction both
Target upload queue
I could just leave the traffic shaping turned off and forget about it, but I would like to understand what is going on in case I need to turn it on in the future.
Logged
OPNsense 24.7.7-amd64 on APU2E4 using ZFS
jrichey98
Newbie
Posts: 2
Karma: 2
Re: Traffic shaping makes bufferbloat score worse
«
Reply #1 on:
March 03, 2024, 04:28:52 am »
I have ATT 500mbps symmetric fiber.
Pipe: ATT-IN
Bandwidth: 540
Scheduler Type: fq_codel
Target: 2ms
Interval: 4ms
Quantum: 1514 (Packet Size, see
https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?ipfw
)
Limit: 1200 (about perfect for 500mbps)
Pipe: ATT-OUT
Bandwidth: 540
Scheduler Type: fq_codel
Target: 2ms
Interval: 4ms
Quantum: 1514 (Packet Size, see
https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?ipfw
)
Limit: 1200 (about perfect for 500mbps)
ECN: Enabled
---
Queues:
- HIGH-IN/OUT
- LOW-IN/OUT
Rules:
-IN & OUT rules for pushing ACK packets under 140 bytes to HIGH.
-IN & OUT rules for pushing DNS to High (by IP) to HIGH.
-IN & OUT rules for pushing regular traffic to LOW.
Notes:
-For rules I use the direction parameter to specify in/out instead of source/dest.
-I only do ECN for outgoing packets, because windows and linux now support it, but not every router/system between you and the internet host probably will.
-Quantum should be large enough to fit a packet, limit should be scaled with bandwidth.
-Don't be afraid to play with super low target/intervals with fiber
if appropriate
. It could be pretty low latency to your first hop. Do a ping to the first gateway and set your target/interval appropriately.
Results:
https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=1ece2bf6-b7a2-4a40-9817-c90db7eafcd1
Best: 13ms+0+0,
Any time every day: 14ms+1+1 / 15ms+0+0
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
OPNsense Forum
»
English Forums
»
24.1 Legacy Series
»
Traffic shaping makes bufferbloat score worse