Napsterbater@car1:~ % sudo opnsense-patchNapsterbater@car1:~ %
Napsterbater@car1:~ % sudo opnsense-patch 61500f6790Found local copy of 61500f6790, skipping fetch.Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...The text leading up to this was:--------------------------|From 61500f6790969ba1c426c27322ba8879dd96bd5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001|From: Franco Fichtner <franco@opnsense.org>|Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:24:09 +0100|Subject: [PATCH] interfaces: suspicious code is suspicious||I'm not sure why interface_bring_down() is needed when both|IPv4 and IPV6 are empty. It sort of means "handle this the|hard way when doing tunnel configurations" althoug the code|disagrees about the historic comment and the code that was|introduced... "set to none" vs. "ipaddr <> none" and later|"empty(ipaddr)" to match the comment. In the grand scheme of|things this does not matter at all...||So in 22.1.3 we removed the inline configuration of GIF and GRE|which causes interface configuration to strip the addresses|added by device configuration instead of refixing it on the|fly (executing code twice all the time). The code flow was|always correct but in practice tripping over itself so now try|a more sensible approach by stripping addresses when we have|assignments going on individually for IPv4 and IPv6.||PR: https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=27553.0|---| src/etc/inc/interfaces.inc | 14 ++++++--------| 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)||diff --git a/src/etc/inc/interfaces.inc b/src/etc/inc/interfaces.inc|index 4ab49d680a..79876b1ba3 100644|--- a/src/etc/inc/interfaces.inc|+++ b/src/etc/inc/interfaces.inc--------------------------Patching file etc/inc/interfaces.inc using Plan A...Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assuming -R.Hunk #1 succeeded at 2200 with fuzz 1 (offset 33 lines).doneAll patches have been applied successfully. Have a nice day.
Any system log from the boot process? This is strange but doesn't seem to indicate what could be wrong.in6_purgeaddr: err=65, destination address delete failedAnd where is the "missing IPv6" configured?Cheers,Franco