[SOLVED] UPnP GUI bug?

[nettexan]

Hey,

First off, thanks for all the work on OPNsense. For the last couple of years I have been using pfSense, which I also like a lot, choice is good. :) I have been playing with it for @48 hours now and it's working quite well. It was absolutely a smooth install on my Supermicro 5018A-FTN4 (which is way overkill for a home network... but hey it's fun). That same hardware gave me a bit of trouble when I first installed pfSense on it (TRIM support, MBUF etc) but OPNsense had no issues. In fairness I doubt a recent fresh install of pfSense would either.

One potential bug I have noticed is that in the GUI for UPnP under "Services: Universal Plug and Play: Settings", even after I check "Enable UPnP & NAT-PMP" and "Allow UPnP Port Mapping", save etc the service starts but the GUI doesn't represent the checks in the boxes.

I am using the latest stable version of Chrome (Version 47.0.2526.73 (64-bit)) and OPNsense (OPNsense 15.7.21-amd64 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p24 OpenSSL 1.0.2d 9 Jul 2015)). My install path was from the latest VGA image of .18 an then used the standard firmware upgrade process.

If there is a better place for me to submit bugs I am happy to do so.

Thanks again for the great software!

[weust]

I can't help you with UPnP as I don't want to use. I prefer to set things manually so I know why things are set that way.

But as you use this machine at home, why not put a hypervisor on it, and use it for more then just a way too overpowered home router?
I have the exact same machine, running Hyper-V 2012 R2. Running several VM's on it, and enough left for experimenting.

[franco]

Hi there,

This was fixed today, here is the commit:

https://github.com/opnsense/core/commit/4cad00670e9ac1d1fe20c17b2d3406e91d94daf9

We are not yet sure when it'll be shipped, some time in the upcoming week for sure.


Cheers,
Franco

[nettexan]

franco:

Awesome! Thanks! It works so no worries. :)

weust:

Yep, I am aware of the issues and concerns with UPnP. While I would never recommend running UPnP in any kind of corp / production environment for now I am comfortable with running it on this particular network and usage case. I just wanted to raise the bug regarding the GUI for it.

A hypervisor would be a great idea but I already have a server behind it doing that and don't really have a use for another. Perhaps I will play around with the IPS when it releases and see if I can break 2% CPU used. ;)

It's a darn good piece of hardware though.

[weust]

Only reason in my home network, where I use mine, where I could use UPnP is my PS4.
And Sony did a shitty job at that, so never seen that working properly for anyone :-)

With home I doubt you'll ever break that. Unless you got some funky 1G fiber at home and some funky VPN encryption going on ;-)

[packet loss]

Only reason in my home network, where I use mine, where I could use UPnP is my PS4.
And Sony did a shitty job at that, so never seen that working properly for anyone :-)

With home I doubt you'll ever break that. Unless you got some funky 1G fiber at home and some funky VPN encryption going on ;-)

upnp is working great for me with my ps4. working with more than one console at a time is definitely going to cause you some issues. what issues are you experiencing weust.

[weust]

More then one console of the same model on the same internet connection will obviously create issues, and since I don't like UPnP I don't have issues :-)