Messages

I see...

So the problem is actually less with the technical concept than the display in the GUI. If the rules were properly ordered like they are processed by the system it would cause less confusion.

Many Greetings!
Zorgoban

Hello Patrick!

Yes, I read that. But my view is probably biased by the products I used the last 30 years, starting with iptables and ipchains. The quick concept doesn't make any sense to me. It feels like complexity without any reason or benefit. I get why I want to continue rules processing for a packet after a log-pass rule. But that option only applies to a single rule and doesn't invisibly split my whole ruleset into two groups.

Many Greetings!
Zorgoban

Hello Patrick!

Thanks for the answer!

I really didn't understand the explanation of the quick option. I also don't understand why this quick concept exists. Wouldn't it be much more intuitive to just have a rule ordering in place like any other firewall does?

Many Greetings!
Zorgoban

Good day!

I'm confused by the order of the rules. The default deny rule should be the last one on any firewall. But for some reason I don't seem to be able to place a rule in front of the default deny rule. Also the automatically generated rules don't seem to be in the proper order. Some automatically generated pass rules are placed behind the default deny rule.

So how am I supposed to place a rule before the default deny rule?

Many Greetings!
Zorgoban