Had my first proper go with IPv6, and I've got to say I'm not a fan. As you suggested, I skipped DNS entries - aside from my DNS server, for which I assigned a ULA to give it a static address for advertisement.
What I've discovered is that if you're relying on dynamic prefix delegation, you're essentially stuck when it comes to static addressing. Even ULAs seem to be deprioritised in favour of IPv4 by most operating systems.
It does make you wonder—why do ISPs issue dynamic prefixes when one of the main selling points of IPv6 is having enough address space to eliminate the need for NAT?
What I've discovered is that if you're relying on dynamic prefix delegation, you're essentially stuck when it comes to static addressing. Even ULAs seem to be deprioritised in favour of IPv4 by most operating systems.
It does make you wonder—why do ISPs issue dynamic prefixes when one of the main selling points of IPv6 is having enough address space to eliminate the need for NAT?