OPNsense
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • OPNsense Forum »
  • Profile of hifol792 »
  • Show Posts »
  • Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts...
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments

Messages - hifol792

Pages: [1]
1
Russian - Русский / Re: Некоторый UDP трафик вызывает packet loss
« on: September 28, 2024, 12:30:37 am »
Проблема решена. Решение выложил на англ. форуме: https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=42990.msg214257#msg214257

Кратко: проблема была из за настройки (static port NO) в NAT

2
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 28, 2024, 12:28:30 am »
Hello everyone. The problem is solved

What was the problem:   
MTR sent UDP packets with fixed source ports, but by default (static port = NO) is enabled in the NAT opnsense settings, thus the outgoing port was set to a new one each time.

Apparently, my provider doesn't like it and he banned me for it.

Solution:
Set manual mode to NAT and set each rule with a static port = YES.

Thank all so much for help  :)

I have only one question, why is this option enabled by default?

3
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 26, 2024, 05:50:30 pm »
Hello everyone.

I checked the internet through another router (openwrt) and everything works fine there.

Also, before that, I checked on a completely clean opnsense 24.7, it did not help solve the problem.

I also attach information about my NIC:
Code: [Select]
igc3@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x125c subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000
    vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
    device     = 'Ethernet Controller I226-V'
    class      = network
    subclass   = ethernet

4
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 04:40:52 pm »
> ... you're behind CGNAT? 
yes

> I think the next step is to prove that you don't see the same problem, when you remove opnsense, i.e using the ISP supplier router if you have one.

I'll check it out.

5
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 04:33:15 pm »
> Well, it seems to make it through the firewall...
Do you mean the provider's firewall?

> Can you dig @1.1.1.1 when you see the problems with 8.8.8.8?

tcpdump from pppoe - dig
Code: [Select]
21:20:59.664312 IP 192.168.1.144.56024 > 1.1.1.1.53: 29888+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.664339 IP 192.168.1.144.56024 > 1.1.1.1.53: 40904+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.687528 IP 192.168.1.144.42368 > 1.1.1.1.53: 17505+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.687546 IP 192.168.1.144.42368 > 1.1.1.1.53: 50282+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.732367 IP 192.168.1.144.47537 > 1.1.1.1.53: 53375+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.732386 IP 192.168.1.144.47537 > 1.1.1.1.53: 3655+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.756007 IP 192.168.1.144.57205 > 1.1.1.1.53: 52608+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.756030 IP 192.168.1.144.57205 > 1.1.1.1.53: 3481+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.800721 IP 192.168.1.144.44555 > 1.1.1.1.53: 1659+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.800741 IP 192.168.1.144.44555 > 1.1.1.1.53: 47200+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:20:59.877564 IP 1.1.1.1.53 > 192.168.1.144.44555: 1659 2/0/0 CNAME redirect.archlinux.org., A 95.216.195.133 (75)
21:20:59.877699 IP 1.1.1.1.53 > 192.168.1.144.44555: 47200 2/0/0 CNAME redirect.archlinux.org., AAAA 2a01:4f9:c010:2636::1 (87)
21:21:01.144887 IP 192.168.1.144.33543 > 1.1.1.1.53: 41086+ A? dns.hd-8000.fun. (33)
21:21:02.003906 IP 192.168.1.144.36696 > 1.1.1.1.53: 7486+ A? kabinet.kemerovo.mts.ru. (41)
21:21:04.505538 IP 192.168.1.144.47328 > 1.1.1.1.53: 7486+ A? kabinet.kemerovo.mts.ru. (41)
21:21:04.669693 IP 192.168.1.144.56024 > 1.1.1.1.53: 29888+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:21:04.669714 IP 192.168.1.144.56024 > 1.1.1.1.53: 40904+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:21:04.692787 IP 192.168.1.144.42368 > 1.1.1.1.53: 17505+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:21:04.692806 IP 192.168.1.144.42368 > 1.1.1.1.53: 50282+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:21:04.737481 IP 192.168.1.144.47537 > 1.1.1.1.53: 53375+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:21:04.737495 IP 192.168.1.144.47537 > 1.1.1.1.53: 3655+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:21:04.761603 IP 192.168.1.144.57205 > 1.1.1.1.53: 52608+ A? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:21:04.761634 IP 192.168.1.144.57205 > 1.1.1.1.53: 3481+ AAAA? ping.archlinux.org. (36)
21:21:06.005407 IP 192.168.1.144.42276 > 1.1.1.1.53: 7486+ A? example.com. (41)
21:21:06.005430 IP 192.168.1.144.45547 > 1.1.1.1.53: 8464+ AAAA? example.com. (41)
21:21:07.005821 IP 192.168.1.144.45112 > 1.1.1.1.53: 9465+ A? k.root-servers.net. (36)
21:21:07.005824 IP 192.168.1.144.49444 > 1.1.1.1.53: 10932+ AAAA? k.root-servers.net. (36)
21:21:09.508329 IP 192.168.1.144.58546 > 1.1.1.1.53: 9465+ A? k.root-servers.net. (36)
21:21:09.508333 IP 192.168.1.144.59279 > 1.1.1.1.53: 10932+ AAAA? k.root-servers.net. (36)
21:21:11.008094 IP 192.168.1.144.39466 > 1.1.1.1.53: 10932+ AAAA? k.root-servers.net. (36)

Some requests pass, but with great difficulty

tcpdump from pppoe - ping
Code: [Select]
21:21:52.385845 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 3634, seq 37, length 64
21:21:52.507677 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 3634, seq 49, length 64
21:21:52.913988 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 8, length 64
21:21:53.927327 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 9, length 64
21:21:54.943987 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 10, length 64
21:21:55.953987 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 11, length 64
21:21:56.970653 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 12, length 64
21:21:57.983988 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 13, length 64
21:21:58.993996 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 14, length 64
21:22:00.007326 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 15, length 64
21:22:01.020664 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 16, length 64
21:22:02.034012 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 17, length 64
21:22:03.047325 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 18, length 64
21:22:04.060663 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 19, length 64
21:22:05.073992 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 20, length 64
21:22:06.087324 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 21, length 64
21:22:07.100668 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 22, length 64
21:22:08.117329 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 23, length 64
21:22:09.127331 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 24, length 64
21:22:10.140662 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 25, length 64
21:22:11.153994 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 26, length 64
21:22:12.020323 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 2918, seq 1, length 64
21:22:12.142855 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 2918, seq 13, length 64
21:22:12.167343 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 27, length 64
21:22:12.265809 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 2918, seq 25, length 64
21:22:12.389405 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 2918, seq 37, length 64
21:22:12.512430 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 2918, seq 49, length 64
21:22:13.180672 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 28, length 64
21:22:14.194012 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 29, length 64
21:22:15.207334 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 30, length 64
21:22:16.220685 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 31, length 64
21:22:17.234032 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 32, length 64
21:22:18.247336 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 33, length 64
21:22:19.260695 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 34, length 64
21:22:20.274001 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 35, length 64
21:22:21.287348 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 36, length 64
21:22:22.300664 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 37, length 64
21:22:23.314009 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 38, length 64
21:22:24.330729 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 39, length 64
21:22:25.340681 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 40, length 64
21:22:26.354207 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 41, length 64
21:22:27.367340 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 42, length 64
21:22:28.380691 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 43, length 64
21:22:29.394032 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 44, length 64
21:22:30.407343 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 45, length 64
21:22:31.424010 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 39924, seq 46, length 64
21:22:32.020359 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 27475, seq 1, length 64
21:22:32.142843 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 27475, seq 13, length 64
21:22:32.264745 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 27475, seq 25, length 64
21:22:32.387374 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 27475, seq 37, length 64
21:22:32.509528 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 27475, seq 49, length 64
21:22:47.842253 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 29957, seq 1, length 64
21:22:48.891512 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 29957, seq 2, length 64
21:22:49.931457 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 29957, seq 3, length 64
21:22:52.018789 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 62932, seq 1, length 64
21:22:52.141018 IP 100.68.87.90 > one.one.one.one: ICMP echo request, id 62932, seq 13, length 64

> Are you sure your ISP doesn't rate limit UDP traffic?  If you remove opnsense completely from the equation, if you can, and use an ISP router, do you see the same then?

Yes, before writing about this problem, I made sure several times that this does not happen again without opnsense.

> From your timestamps, I'm guessing you're in South East Asia (GMT+7) somewhere?  I know for a fact some of the ISPs in that region do filter/limit traffic.
Yes. Russia. But as I wrote above, there is no such thing without opnsense.



6
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 04:10:50 pm »
> ... have you checked the firewall logs for drops? 

I checked and I don't see anything blocked during the test

tcpdump during network problems due to mtr:

pppoe1:
Code: [Select]
21:04:07.785801 IP 100.68.87.90.64228 > 8.8.8.8.53: 6509+ [1au] A? google.com. (51)
21:04:12.790998 IP 100.68.87.90.16792 > 8.8.8.8.53: 6509+ [1au] A? google.com. (51)
21:04:17.791183 IP 100.68.87.90.50947 > 8.8.8.8.53: 6509+ [1au] A? google.com. (51)

lan:
Code: [Select]
21:04:07.785782 IP 192.168.1.148.57720 > 8.8.8.8.53: 6509+ [1au] A? google.com. (51)
21:04:12.790960 IP 192.168.1.148.33664 > 8.8.8.8.53: 6509+ [1au] A? google.com. (51)
21:04:17.791164 IP 192.168.1.148.36768 > 8.8.8.8.53: 6509+ [1au] A? google.com. (51)

> Did you see this problem on 24.1?  Or have you only ever run 24.7
I will try to check this point as soon as I can

7
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 03:49:18 pm »
Here is a video with the problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17CJXPKaLWo

> What else is running there
I had Wireguard running. During the test below, I disabled it.
I attached a screenshot
I don't use anything custom anymore.

> what is your setup ?
What do you mean by that?

8
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 03:31:19 pm »
@newsense You mean https://www.crowdsec.net / ? I don't use it.

9
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 03:29:56 pm »
Hello. Thanks for trying to help

I have just done the following:
- Disabled all LAN rules, leaving only one that allows all traffic (I don't have rules on the WAN)
- Turned off hardware acceleration
- Turned off all gateways leaving only pppoe
- Removed all non-standard tunables
- Switched NAT to automatic

In each step, I restarted the router and checked how it behaves with mtr --udp.

None of this helped

10
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 12:21:13 pm »
Hello.

I've rebooted it many times. By the way, I tried restarting the router right now. Nothing has changed.

I also deleted almost all custom tunables (also with restart). Now I have only these:

hw.ibrs_disable = 1
net.inet.rss.bits = 2
net.inet.rss.enabled = 1
net.isr.bindthreads = 1
net.isr.dispatch = deferred
net.isr.maxthreads = -1
vm.pmap.pti = 0

Also tried to switch NAT without manual rules, it also did not give anything.

UPD: Traffic shaper was disabled a few days ago. It also didn't help solve the problem.

11
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 02:24:14 am »
I checked the MTU via ping with don't fragment. The same value as was set before (1492) is suitable. I also tried to lower it, it didn't help.

Maybe it has something to do with the firewall? At the time of the test, if I run and do not disable ping, then there is no packet loss in it and it works fine. But at the same time, if I launch a new ping, it doesn't work.

Also, during the test, it affects other devices on the network

12
24.7 Production Series / Re: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 25, 2024, 12:35:53 am »
Hello, thanks for the reply.

I did the checks and couldn't find the IP leak. I also disabled traffic shaper, but it didn't help

I checked again that the problem is not with my provider. The problem is reproduced only with the router

Code: [Select]
root@opnsense:/tmp # cat dump | wc -l
    7317
root@opnsense:/tmp # cat dump | grep "MY PPPOEE IP" | wc -l
    7317

13
24.7 Production Series / Solved: [24.7.4] Some UDP traffic causes packet loss
« on: September 23, 2024, 01:55:03 pm »
Hello everyone

This mostly comes from 'mtr --udp 8.8.8.8' (the same situation happens when downloading torrents). After the launch, 10 seconds pass and all devices on the network cannot reach via UDP (for example, dns requests) or if ping is started over again. TCP continues to work.

If the ping was started before, then there is no packet loss.

I also ran mtr (with the udp flag) directly on the router and this does not happen

OPNsense 24.7.4_1-amd64

14
Russian - Русский / Решено: Некоторый UDP трафик вызывает packet loss
« on: September 23, 2024, 10:33:33 am »
Всем привет!

Вбиваю 'mtr --udp 8.8.8.8', проходит 10 секунд и сразу все устройства в сети не могут достучатся по UDP (к примеру до dns) или если запустить ping по новой. Если пинг до был запущен, то потерть пакетов нету.

Проверил тоже самое на роутере и такого эффекта нет.

Куда копать?

OPNsense 24.7.4_1-amd64

Pages: [1]
OPNsense is an OSS project © Deciso B.V. 2015 - 2024 All rights reserved
  • SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy     | XHTML | RSS | WAP2