Messages

I think the main issue is not the re-install of the package, but the segfaults created by pkg.
When I manually install the package after the update, pkg segfaults during the post-install steps. Here is a picture of my current pkg status.

I think what's happening is pkg gets upgraded, breaks and is unable to continue with the remaining steps.
My firewall-01 without update has pkg version 1.19.2

Same problem here. I upgraded my secondary cluster node to 25.7.6 and the update broke everything.
I had to recover the node as described in the other thread, but now a lot of things seem to be broken. For example, Firmware > Plugins does no longer list available plugins and pkg segfaults every single run. I assume the node is lost and needs to be reinstalled.

For testing I upgraded a different vm based on an older snapshot and it also broke with the same issue. I wonder why a obviously broken update is not reverted and still available for download.

Hi!

Are there any downsides to this?

I just wonder why every guide takes the first approach.

Hi,

I would like to run a OPNsense Firewall as a virtual guest on a Linux KVM Hypervisor.
The Hypervisor is connected with 2x 10G Fiber to a Switch.

Now the question is how to best configure VLANs:

• My first idea was to have a network bridge for each VLAN on the Hypervisor and this seems to work fine. But adding each VLAN to the firewall with a own interface creates a lot of interfaces. Also it will require to reboot the firewall guest and I would like to avoid this.
  Example: Interface A+B (eth0/1) -> Team (team0) -> VLAN (team0.100) -> Bridge (br.team0.100) added to the VM for each VLAN
  
  
• ChatGPT suggested to create a single bridge on the hypervisor and connect this bridge (without any VLANs)
  Example: Interface A+B (eth0/1) -> Team (team0) -> Bridge (br.team0) added to the VM, VLANs configured in OPNsense

I couldn't find many guides about the second approach, but it sounds better, because a new VLAN would not require a guest reboot and it doesn't create lots of interfaces on the hypervisor. So I wonder if there is any best practices for this?

Thanks.