Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Waldus66668

#1
Sorry for making confusion. What I wrote is not 100% accurate for i226.

But in general eeupdate64e is easier to use since it does not require configuration file.

But going back to i226 - my workflow is following:

1 - to determine inventory I use Linux version of nvmupdate64e (from Intel driver pack)

2 - to flash i226 NVM I use Linux version of eeupdate64e. Please see this link:

CSG150 i226 NIC NVM update instructions

There in step 5 you will find instruction. Direct link to download Linux version of eeupdate64e is here:

CSG150_NVM_225.tar.gz

For me this has been working reliably.

Unfortunately EFI version of eeupdate64e compatible with i226 is not publicly available.

#2
I find EFI version on NVM tool easier to use. Simply grab eeupdate64e.efi form Intel driver pack, boot into EFI shell and run command like:

eeupdate64e.efi /nic=1 /d=FXVL_125C_V_1MB_2.32.bin
You only specify nic number and name of NVM file to flash. No need to worry about configuration file.
#3
I have ASRock NUC BOX-255H with i226V and i226LM. I'm on 2.22 with BIOS that disables ASPM for both of them. i226V works rock solid. i226LM stops forwarding traffic every few days. Can i update i226LM NVM using file for i226V? I don't care about "LM" management features. This happens on Proxmox 9 where I have 2xOPNsense VMs.
#4
Hi, bug report created. In description I put link to this thread.
#5
Zenarmor (Sensei) / Problem with blocking YouTube
April 30, 2021, 11:08:18 AM
Hi, I have a strange problem with blocking YouTube and I'm not sure if this is Sensei bug or configuration issue.

I run OPNsense as Proxmox VM. There are 2 vtnet interfaces and 5 VLAN-s. On LAN side there are 4 VLAN on top of vtnet0.

Engine is 1.8.2
App and Rules 1.8.21040109

Sensei is configured "Routed Mode (L3 Mode, Reporting + Blocking) with native netmap driver" and protected interface is "Unassigned vtnet0". In policy configuration App Controls I selected to block all entries with YouTube in name and additionaly "Quic UDP". In such configuration all 4 VLAN-s running on vtnet0 should be protected. The problem is that YouTube is not blocked. When I go to Dashboard and check Session Details I see connections as Blocked but Byes In/Out indicate that traffic is not blocked and indeed YouYube is working.

When I changed protected interface to individual VLAN-s then YouTube is blocked as intended.

So to the questions:
1 - What is correct Protected interface selection in case VLAN-s are in use?
2 - Is behavior that I observe due to missconfiguration or shall I open support ticket to get this fixed.

Thank you,
Krzysztof