Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - dejhost

#1
Right, will do! Actually, for my TrueNAS-VM as well :-)

I totally agree with Ricardo: we should document your input somehow, so it's easier to find. I'd be happy to contribute, if you instruct me.
#2
Hi.

The only alternative I have to i440fx is q35, which is even older. So I stick to i440fx for now.

I changed the network adapter to VMware vmxnet3 and will monitor if this helps. If the network is more reliable now, we know for sure what caused it. I will report back to you.

Thanks again!
#3
I really appreciate that you spend so much time on this.

See the screenshot attched.
The em1 has a cat5e cable with rj45-connector (1000Mbit), to a router from my ISP, switching to fiber there:

Status up
DHCP
up   
MAC address
MTU 1500
IPv4 address
IPv4 gateway
IPv6 link-local
DNS servers 109.247.114.4
92.220.228.70
Media 1000baseT <full-duplex>
In/out packets 156306529 / 156761362 (206.97 GB / 27.24 GB)
In/out packets (pass) 156101589 / 156761362 (206.96 GB / 27.24 GB)
In/out packets (block) 3403990 / 0 (200 KB / 0 bytes)
In/out errors 0 / 0
Collisions 0
Interrupts
irq device total rate
irq11 em1:irq0++ 147233016 877
 


root@OPNsense:~ # vmstat -i
interrupt                          total       rate
irq1: atkbd0                         199          0
irq10: em0:irq0                126321288        743
irq11: em1:irq0++              147666702        869
irq14: ata0                     72743347        428
cpu0:timer                       9987002         59
cpu1:timer                       7230780         43
cpu2:timer                      10365342         61
cpu3:timer                       6961074         41
Total                          381275734       2243


The underlying physical storage... unsure what you want to know... a local SSD, SCSI controller

#4
Second image...
#5
Find 2 screenshots below. The first one is with netflow disabled, the second has netflow enabled.

QuoteIs this system pushing a lot of traffic?
I've been uploading 100Gb to Nextcloud yesterday (using Nextclouds web-interface), from a PC outside the LAN. Other than that, It was mostly just browsing or streaming some music. I am unexperienced when it comes to network, but I don't believe that this cause a higher CPU load. It's a home network with very limited amount of users.
#6
Please see the screenshot below.
Of course, now that the doctor is here, the pain vannishes: CPU is down to 25%. I am not aware of any changes in my network that could cause this. I will keep an eye on it a run the command again, when the CPU-load rises again.
#7
Adding a screenshot of system resources, including CPU-load...
#8
Hi all!

I am worried about the CPU loadin OPNsense, which is in average about 60%. Even if there is little traffic going on.
"top" tells me, that two sqlite3-processes use about 50% of my CPU. Shouldn't be like that, should it?

I would be very grateful if someone could help me troubleshooting this. Thanks in advance.

dejhost
---

My  Setup:

  • OPNsense v. 21.1.5-amd64, FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p16-HBSD, OpenSSL 1.1.1k 25 Mar 2021.
  • OPNsense is a VM within Proxmox, PVE Manager Version pve-manager/6.4-4/337d6701.
  • Hardware: Lenovo Thinkserver (https://support.lenovo.com/cy/en/solutions/pd014761), with CPU(s) 8 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz.
  • The OPNsense-VM has 2Gb of RAM, 4 Cores Type Sandybridge. The last 4 CPU-flags in Proxmox are disabled - please see image attached.