Messages

Actually no as it is working just fine and very stable unlike OPNsense which feels like constantly running alpha software.

I gave up on it and installed pfsense. It just so happened the same week pf implemented WireGuard into the kernel. I've had no issues with it so far. The people here are very good about helping others however the mods just blame everything on FreeBSD. So anyway, not looking back. Good luck everyone.

Hehe, maybe you'll come back one day, and we'll be here waiting :-)

I gave up on it and installed pfsense. It just so happened the same week pf implemented WireGuard into the kernel. I've had no issues with it so far. The people here are very good about helping others however the mods just blame everything on FreeBSD. So anyway, not looking back. Good luck everyone.

So maybe some of you who love WireGuard like I do will be able to help me figure out what is going on.... So I have a WG0 connection coming into my router. It is awesome for accessing the LAN when out and about. I have had this a long time without any issues. The other day I added an interface for accessing a VPN. So I set this up to access Mullvad. My goal was to do this in a way that I could select what devices on the network to go to the WG1 interface and the others I just wanted to keep on the WAN. The problem is when I connect to WG1, WG0 looses its ability to handshake. WG0 will not connect at all. I don't see this being an issue once WG goes to kernel but in the meantime I have to deal with user space.

If anyone has run into this issue maybe can help out. TIA.

This is most likely due to FreeBSD 12. However since this was introduced in July, it's seems a "bug" reducing WAN throughput from 1gb to 518 mbps would be one of your top priorities.  ;)

Ok so I gave it a few days and decided to give it a try. Upgrade and clean install. Still the problem is there. I don't know what to do but to either stay on 20.1.9 or give pfsense a try.

Can anyone confirm that this issue has been resolved with 20.7.4? I'm still on 20.1.9 waiting to upgrade but won't do it if I can't reach 1 gb throughput.

TIA

Looking at this patch... it is not present in 12.1 so there might be an issue there, but probably always has been.


Cheers,
Franco

I didn't notice higher CPU but I did notice higher temp. 20.1 runs around 49c to about 52. 20.7 was 56c to about 59. Don't know if this helps but its what I observed.

Didn't work for me. I did a clean install and didn't touch anything. Went to speedtest and still 590mbps down max on 20.7 same with 20.7.1. I get 920mbps down on 20.1.

My hardware:

Intel Atom C2758 2.4GHz 8-Core Processor; ASPEED AST2400, VGA Max. Resolution: 1920 x 1200 @60Hz
Includes 8GB DDR3-1600MHz ECC SODIMM; Supports 4x 204-pin DDR3 SODIMM, Maximum 64GB capacity, Supports ECC Un-buffered Memory, 1333MHz Minimum, 1.5V or 1.35V
Supports 2x 3.5" drives or 1x 3.5" drives + 1 Full height PCI-E x8 (2.0)
4x Intel I354 GbE and 1x Realtek 8211E-PHY for IPMI

Hello All,
Test the energy management setting once
on Hightadaptive! All others reduce the transfer rates to about 50%.
Greetings from Germany

I can confirm that this does NOT solve the issue. Both 20.7 and 20.7.1 have this issue. I will have to go back to the previous version.

I agree... thinking I'll wait a bit. 20.1.9 seems to be working fine for now.

So its back to normal or not? I'm not upgrading until it is fixed. I may wait for a point release before I upgrade. 20.7 seems to be full of bugs.

Exactly my problem as well.

Like I said. Clean install on both versions. Everything default and the issue remains.

Well I went back to the previous version. Can't take a 400 mb hit like that. My cpu is 2.4 ghz 8 cores and runs under 10% so something is up with the latest version.

Hello all,

I have been testing the upgrade and found that my speed is cut in half after the upgrade. I can go back to 20.1 and it returns to normal. Has anyone else had this problem?. Some may not see it if you don't get 1gb down. Mine is 900/45 but when I upgrade I get 590/45. Clean install both versions to get the same results.