{ "error": { "root_cause": [ { "type": "index_not_found_exception", "reason": "no such index", "resource.type": "index_or_alias", "resource.id": "alert_all", "index_uuid": "_na_", "index": "alert_all" } ], "type": "index_not_found_exception", "reason": "no such index", "resource.type": "index_or_alias", "resource.id": "alert_all", "index_uuid": "_na_", "index": "alert_all" }, "status": 404}
After taking out the custom option in web controls from our hands, youtube not loading video after added in Auto Whitelist Hosts.May be it's not good idea to take feature after feature from the free version with every update after all...
@donatom3, which devices would be out-of-scope is random and dependent on the memory state buffers. With device identification we'll enable user to select which devices to cover. For now, a higher tier would be more suitable. Also note that only IPv4 addresses count, so if you have a dual stack, it won't affect memory buffer limits.Having said that, as a gratitude to our BETA users like you, we'll be providing a suitable discount for higher tiers so that it would still be in the lower tier price range. More on this next week.
@mb (again) .....just saw the SOHO pricing, $99/yr is very competitive.the issue I see here is that with the explosion of IoT and other things in a household, 15 devices is just much too low for a home environment in 2019.for example, my device count ('Unique Local Hosts' in the last 24hrs, according to the Sensi Dashboard) is 41.per the current structure, that would cost ~$1200/yr, which is completely unreasonable.no one in their right mind is going to spend two mortgage payments every year just to keep the Chinese out of their lightbulbs, the Russians out of their Alexas, the local stalkers and thieves out of their home security systems, and successfully divert accidental Japanese donkey porn away from their kids' surfing sessions, too; they shouldn't have to choose which subset of these goals can be achieved due to an arbitrarily-low device cap.security is only as good as its weakest link, and if a home user has to pick which devices to cover with Sensei's gaze, and which ones to leave exposed to armageddon, then invariably they will be outfoxed.while ad-hoc device coverage makes for good eye-candy, it's not particularly better than no coverage at all, because human beings are fallible and will inevitably pick combinations that leave attack vectors available.would you consider raising the paid SOHO plan limit to 50? -- this would put you at parity with e.g. the device cap of SophosXG Home (which is free, fwiw).LOL maybe even one-up the Sophos folks & make it 51 -- just because you can. thanks! (likely a big thanks from everyone!! )
