@Starkstromkonsument the dyndns plugin is very old and practically unmaintained, it would need a rewrite, which isn't very high on our list of things todo (I'm not convinced it needs the current level of entanglement into the system either). Adding more glue often doesn't improve the situation and decreases the chances of a rewrite, but that's just my opinion.If you want to cleanup the existing plugin, best keep it in the same PR in this case to avoid merge conflicts. Since I personally don't want to spend a lot of time on this, it would be good to gather some people who offer to test, maybe ask around on the forum to collect some.When a couple of users can test the new code and vouch for it, I don't mind pulling in a larger batch to solve different issues, as long as you (or anyone else) promises to look at possible new issues that emerge after releasing it to the general public.I can open this issue and assign it to you if you like, I don't think anyone else is interested in "owning" the issue currently.
