Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - nikkon

#16
this is how it looks like now:

root@yoda:/usr/local/etc/wireguard # cat wg2.conf
####################################################
# Interface settings, not used by `wg`             #
# Only used for reference and detection of changes #
# in the configuration                             #
####################################################
# Address =  10.14.0.2/16
# DNS =
# MTU =
# disableroutes = 1
# gateway =

[Interface]
PrivateKey = kMfvy7/6Ec4d73ERKJ90MqUkMug9Kh********
ListenPort = 51820

[Peer]
# friendly_name = WireGuard_tbs
PublicKey = L79E4IoaVZBXOyoMM82TvUIbiKlloR*******
Endpoint = ge-tbs.prod.surfshark.com:51820
AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0
#17
you're right as well.
Wireguard is back.

wg2 seems connected but 0 traffic

https://ibb.co/2FPm6xM
#18
I've switch the WireGuard to openvpn. I'll fix the WireGuard config later. However the same config file works on desktop - something to check out for me.
Next, I've changed the interface from wg2 to openvpn1.
What have you noticed in the rules? I can't figure out the mistakes ☹️
Thank you
#20
Just realized they haven't went through as the size is to big. Let me re do
#21
Hi folks,

I am reopening this topic hoping that some of you may be able to help me. I spent the last week trying to figure this out and there is something off here.

I on OPNsense 24.7.7-amd64 and as for VPN provider I am using Surfshark.
I'll post here a short description of my setup:
I am trying to route via Surfshark WireGuard the a few hosts from the Lan network named VPN_VLAN10 (172.16.20.1/29)

Step 1:
I created the wireguard setup:
wg2 is the device under instances. as in the following attachement it looks connected however it never receives any traffic.

Step 2:
I assigned a virtual interface to WG2 and I named Surfshark_VPN.

Step 3:
I created a new Gateway which unfortunately doesn't connect.

Step 4:
I add the NAT outbound rule
Surfshark_VPN   any   *   *   *   Interface address   *   NO   

Step 5:
I add the firewall rule on the Lan interface I want to use this connection as gateway
IPv4 *   torrent_host_ip_lan    *   *   *   SURFSHARK_Wireguard   *

Now, from the host specified at step5 I cannot ping anyware, neither 172.16.20.1 which is the gateway for the VPN_VLAN10 lan network.
There is something I am completely missing, but I simply can't see it. on one hand the wireshark gateway is not connecting, second when I activate the routing via SURFSHARK_Wireguard gateway rule on the lan interface, I can't reach the lan gateway anymore.

Any suggestion at this point is highly appreciated.

Thank you
#22
great to see this tool. thank you. planning to use it now.
#23
can be closed.
the pppoe interface needs to have a Vlan attached to it to work. VLAN ID6 then it connects.

#24
General Discussion / KPN fiber bypass vendor router
March 28, 2024, 12:43:22 PM
Hi all,

I just switch to KPN Fiber and I can see that their router is using PPPoE to connect to KPN.
I created the connection on my opnsense, however I can't make it connect.
Does anyone have this done? I need some guidance to make this work.
KPN support is not helping.
#25
I tried :)
#26
General Discussion / dns the same IP but different ports
February 19, 2024, 06:19:16 PM
Hi all,
I am looking for guidance.
I upgraded truenas core to scale. core jais had the possibility to get IPs from LAN DHCP, but the new OS with k8s can't. So, as on Truenas Scale all apps share the same ingress IP (turnas IP), can I add different DNS entries and filter by port & name ?

Thank you
#27
does anyone knows what this long means:
2023-11-14T13:41:01   Warning   haproxy   Proxy <HTTPCLIENT> stopped (cumulated conns: FE: 0, BE: 0).   
2023-11-14T13:41:01   Warning   haproxy   Proxy HASS_Backend stopped (cumulated conns: FE: 0, BE: 0).   
2023-11-14T13:41:01   Warning   haproxy   Proxy PLEX_Backend stopped (cumulated conns: FE: 0, BE: 0).   
2023-11-14T13:41:01   Warning   haproxy   Proxy acme_challenge_backend stopped (cumulated conns: FE: 0, BE: 0).   
2023-11-14T13:41:01   Warning   haproxy   Proxy NAS_Backend stopped (cumulated conns: FE: 0, BE: 0).

#28
Hardware and Performance / Re: i3-9100 vs i5-8500
November 14, 2023, 02:00:27 PM
depends on the application.
are you building a traffic filter? or just a router/firewall?
I would go for the T models for low consumption
#29
I am trying to use this howto only for the internal services (I have no intention to expose them out) and I can't make it work.
can anyone give me a hand with this. I tried everything I know to make this work.