1
General Discussion / Re: Switching from KPN PPPoE to IPoE
« on: July 22, 2019, 05:35:14 pm »
Really nobody with a similar setup?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
General Discussion / Switching from KPN PPPoE to IPoE
« on: July 17, 2019, 11:19:51 pm »
My fiber provider in Holland (KPN) offered me a free upgrade from 100Mb to 200Mb, but told me I need to switch from PPPoE to IPoE.
Current situation: WAN is PPPoE, getting first IP automatically from my /29 subnet from provider, and configured the remaining IPs as an alias, working perfectly fine. LAN is on 192.168.1.0/24.
As I was unfamiliar with IPoE I started looking around and read everywhere I should just change the WAN type to DHCP and asked KPN for confirmation for that.
To my surprise they told me it was quite different and gave me a example config for Cisco looking quite strange to me. This was the only example they could provide. The Cisco config they gave me seem to tell to configure the WAN on a static IP in a different /30 subnet (calling it a “interlink subnet”) with a gateway in that same subnet and configure my current /29 subnet on the LAN side…
!## Guide, instelling IPOE met Cisco Router.
!## Poortype kan afwijken
!-------
!------- WAN poort ----
!------- interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 description Connection to WAN ip address 145.54.111.62 255.255.255.252 speed 100 duplex FULL MTU 1500
!
!
!
!-------
!------- LAN ------
!-------
! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1 description to Customer LAN ip address 31.149.115.137 255.255.255.248
!
!
! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 145.54.111.61
!
That looks ridiculous to me, as I don’t want my public IPs on the LAN! And I also don’t want to buy a another router to put in front of OPNsense so I could use my public IPs on my OPNsense WAN.
Any idea how to configure this right on the OPNsense WAN interface? Could I probably just use the /30 subnet as suggested as primary and configure the /29 as aliases on the WAN also?
Anyone familiar with IPoE in general and/or KPN setup in particular?
Regards,
Julian
Current situation: WAN is PPPoE, getting first IP automatically from my /29 subnet from provider, and configured the remaining IPs as an alias, working perfectly fine. LAN is on 192.168.1.0/24.
As I was unfamiliar with IPoE I started looking around and read everywhere I should just change the WAN type to DHCP and asked KPN for confirmation for that.
To my surprise they told me it was quite different and gave me a example config for Cisco looking quite strange to me. This was the only example they could provide. The Cisco config they gave me seem to tell to configure the WAN on a static IP in a different /30 subnet (calling it a “interlink subnet”) with a gateway in that same subnet and configure my current /29 subnet on the LAN side…
!## Guide, instelling IPOE met Cisco Router.
!## Poortype kan afwijken
!-------
!------- WAN poort ----
!------- interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 description Connection to WAN ip address 145.54.111.62 255.255.255.252 speed 100 duplex FULL MTU 1500
!
!
!
!-------
!------- LAN ------
!-------
! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1 description to Customer LAN ip address 31.149.115.137 255.255.255.248
!
!
! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 145.54.111.61
!
That looks ridiculous to me, as I don’t want my public IPs on the LAN! And I also don’t want to buy a another router to put in front of OPNsense so I could use my public IPs on my OPNsense WAN.
Any idea how to configure this right on the OPNsense WAN interface? Could I probably just use the /30 subnet as suggested as primary and configure the /29 as aliases on the WAN also?
Anyone familiar with IPoE in general and/or KPN setup in particular?
Regards,
Julian
3
19.1 Legacy Series / Re: IPoE
« on: July 12, 2019, 12:12:22 pm »
Did you ever made this work? KPN told me I could upgrade my fibre connection, but need to switch to IPoE as well.
Is this simply setting the WAN to DHCP or Static IP instead of PPPoE what is currently used?
Is this simply setting the WAN to DHCP or Static IP instead of PPPoE what is currently used?
4
17.7 Legacy Series / Ipsec NAT/BINAT option missing
« on: September 09, 2017, 03:28:47 pm »
Reading the docs it seems there should be a NAT/BINAT options in the ipsec phase2 settings to do translation before the traffic enters the tunnel. However, in my setup (17.7.1) it is missing. Has this changed and are the docs not updated or am I missing something else?
Julian
Julian
Pages: [1]