Quote from: brinm00 on April 15, 2020, 04:21:52 PMAs a sort of a workaround you could bind unbound (with blacklists) only to one interface and dnsmasq on the others.
Do you of any plans to make it available on only a subset of the interfaces ?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: brinm00 on April 15, 2020, 04:21:52 PMAs a sort of a workaround you could bind unbound (with blacklists) only to one interface and dnsmasq on the others.
Do you of any plans to make it available on only a subset of the interfaces ?
# ping 192.168.1.254
PING 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.580 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.366 ms[quote]# tcpdump -nn -i re1 host 192.168.1.254
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on re1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
14:36:51.814864 IP 195.50.196.206 > 192.168.1.254: ICMP echo request, id 19307, seq 0, length 64
14:36:51.815392 IP 192.168.1.254 > 195.50.196.206: ICMP echo reply, id 19307, seq 0, length 64
14:36:52.818861 IP 195.50.196.206 > 192.168.1.254: ICMP echo request, id 19307, seq 1, length 64
14:36:52.819747 IP 192.168.1.254 > 195.50.196.206: ICMP echo reply, id 19307, seq 1, length 64
[/quote]
Quote from: siga75 on March 01, 2020, 12:13:44 PMYes, that is also what I assumed, but it would be nice if it was evident from GUI help itself.
in most unix systems both 0 and 7 are sunday, I suppose it's the same for freeBSD