1
24.1 Production Series / Re: No console menu
« on: February 26, 2024, 04:59:31 pm »
System - Settings - Administration - Console: do NOT check the "USB-based serial" checkbox.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I am perversely happy that a probable source of speed complaints about it is it doing too aggressive logging under stress, as reported on this bug here today.
The freebsd bug is being tracked here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276890
https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=31410.msg173387#msg173387
...comes directly from kernel, so fine tuning or life with it...
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 258
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 125
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 125
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 125
fq_codel_enqueue over limit
i understand it fires a script when changes on the interface can happen. But still something seems to cause the issue when the script fires (at least i assume this based on your answer) so we should try to debug this instead of saying never up and down an interface to avoid running the script ?Doubt it. Reason switches exist. People do it, sure. Want to live with the necessary disruption? I don't.
Also i assume its a pretty normal setup for people connecting devices to the firewall itself without a switch ?
I have a 8-port setup, no bridge needed.
2024-02-15T08:46:10 Error opnsense /usr/local/etc/rc.linkup: The command `/sbin/ifconfig 'bridge0' addm 'igb1'' failed to execute
Suspiciously the time i shutdown my PC was around 2PM and it looks like after that unbnound started failing. Booting it up again in the morning at around 08:50 and unbound worked again ? Could this have something to do with an specific interface going up or down ? Its the first time i see the link between client going up and down influencing unbound but maybe its just random.
I have created a NAT rule on the WAN address in my dedicated server:
additionally, within the OPNsense web proxy setup, I've implemented a transparent proxy configuration relying on a Certificate Authority (CA). Unfortunately, this necessitates the installation of the CA on every client device to enable internet access. Is there a viable alternative method that eliminates the need for deploying the CA to each client?