OPNsense
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • OPNsense Forum »
  • Profile of its »
  • Show Posts »
  • Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts...
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments

Messages - its

Pages: [1]
1
Hardware and Performance / Re: opnsense & proxmox (kvm)
« on: March 26, 2017, 10:05:49 am »
Bingo!

Disabling tso/lro fixed iperf performance from/to the opnsense guest. It didn't much for forwarding performance (vm->opnsense->vm) however. But this is a different ballgame.

2
Hardware and Performance / Re: opnsense & proxmox (kvm)
« on: March 26, 2017, 03:59:28 am »
In the guests or in the hosts? Which offloading?

3
Hardware and Performance / opnsense & proxmox (kvm)
« on: March 25, 2017, 07:57:17 pm »
Hi all,

I have been comparing FreeBSD and opnsense network performance inside proxmox with virtio nics. Using iperf, I can push 4-5 Gbits from/to FreeBSD (vanilla install) to a Linux host. Doing the same with opnsense, and for that matter pfsense, gets me at best 300-500 Mbits. Routing performance is consistent with the latter number.

While iperf is running the intr{irqxxx, virtio} thread is taking  ~50% and the kernel{virtio} thread another ~30 of a single core. I believe I disabled pf and it didn't seem to make a difference. In contrast, I am only seeing ~40% in the intr{} thread on FreeBSD.

Does anyone have a guess what might be going on?

Pages: [1]
OPNsense is an OSS project © Deciso B.V. 2015 - 2024 All rights reserved
  • SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    | XHTML | RSS | WAP2