1
23.7 Legacy Series / Re: Do Hardware Requirements only pertain to Bare Metal Installs? (eg VMs don't care
« on: January 09, 2024, 01:26:25 am »For the build, you seem to be thinking as if it was a PC build. For instance a firewall doesn't need all that storage. In fact NVMe is totally overkill. SSD is perfect. HD is good but not as much.
All you need is a high clock CPU,especially if you are on PPoE from your mention of a modem.
Forget about wifi on a firewall based on OPN. It's based on freeBSD that is not great for hardware support for wifi cards. There are some supported and OPN can use some of them but save yourself the trouble. There WILL be troubles to overcome.
You don't need a GPU.
What you need is a small device with at least 2 network interfaces, preferable Intel, not Realtek. A CPU of at least 2 GHz, 2 cores will work, 4 are better. More are not strictly needed. One SSD of at least 60 GB or more. 120 is more usable. More is OK but unnecessary unless you plan on logging a lot.
Do you have PPoE from your ISP? Do you have a switch already?
Finally. The ability to stream is depending on your what throughput you can achieve on the WAN interface from your ISP, what is your current bandwith? Together with the PPoE question, it should give enough info.
The CPU family (Celeron D, Core, AMD Ryzen, etc) is of no importance. As long as is AMD64 it is fine. What matters is the single core score.
Have a look in the docs as well https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/hardware.html
I cannot find any PPPoE setting but I have DOCSIS 3.0 modem-router combo using Gigabit Ethernet if that helps. My goal would be to encapsulate all traffic (Windscribe VPN preferred/proxy/other?) before it hits the modem through my router build.
Worst-case scenario, if I must statically assign all IP addresses or reserve them I'm game to do that but I am thinking I should be able to use DHCP and maybe some reservation options if available. Am I missing the need of PPPoE?
I'd probably go deeper into networking via docker as described by networkchuck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKFMS5C4CG0
As for the build/overkill/etc, it's all in a tight Mini-ITX with M2 availability so I went NVME route. I already got wife-approval for the NAS cost and it's already ordered.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uPCGbGBkXNxi13QBL3sQIqwB--y_Xs_IGbAG6MdncPw/edit?usp=sharing
So here's the thing about WiFi cards: They're designed to be clients, not Access Points. You will have a very bad, but memorable experience if you try to use them as Access Points. Buy a purpose built AP, like an Omada 620.
A router and a NAS should be 2 completely separate appliances, and shouldn't be combined. You don't haul lumber in a Prius, don't store data on your router.
Gosh I thought I did research on this already but I cannot find it in my bookmarks or saved videos. I think I went down a "make sure it's not a bridge-only wifi device" or something to that nature. This sounds painful but if it's possible, or not, or "really hard" based on this motherboard https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16813162033 please let me know I'm willing to try anything, even if you point me in the right direction (not off the cliff please!) I'd greatly appreciate it. Worst-case scenario, I buy a PCIe AP?
As for router-NAS being independent device, I understand the single point failure concern and potentially security concern but my thought is if the router is on a different bare metal drive and the other NICs are handled downstream, it could be considered as separate communication channel while leveraging same processing hardware. It's mostly a hobby project for me to learn stuff and see if it's possible. Maybe in the future I'll toss the router on a rPi or similar, smaller footprint device.