Quote from: Nullman on July 20, 2026, 04:58:03 PMNope. Its all default. No additional packages, no tuneables.
Thanks.. 👍
What is your WAN connection type? PPoE or other?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Nullman on July 20, 2026, 04:58:03 PMNope. Its all default. No additional packages, no tuneables.
Quote from: Nullman on July 20, 2026, 10:06:50 AMIm running opnsense on Protectli Vault FW6E with core boot bios. Since i upgraded to 26.7 i noticed much lower CPU temperatures on all cores. On 26.1 unit was sitting at 55C on idle, and 70C in full load. Its now sitting at 44C at idle and its hitting 66C at full load. To make this even more interesting, its much hotter outside today than it was before. Device is sitting in a small closed rack in a room with no AC. Did anyone else noticed lower temps on passively cooled devices ? Is this because of FreeBSD 15.1 ?
Great job Franco and the gang.
Quote from: Firewire on July 15, 2026, 12:04:37 AMSomething seems broken with the latest update, blocky cannot be installed anymore.
I removed my blocky 0.28 version, updated via pkg update and tried installing 0.33 version.
After installing via "pkg install os-blocky-guru" or via "System -> Firmware -> Plugins -> os-blocky-guru" it doesn't get installed.
No error message or hint what might be wrong, could you check if it is the same on your system?
Quote from: Firewire on July 11, 2026, 10:53:38 AMHi gspannu, thanks for creating the repo but Blocky is outdated by many versions now.
What do you think about an Autobuilder script that creates a FreeBSD package for Blocky automatically when an update is released by the official project?
Quote from: dirtyfreebooter on April 16, 2026, 06:31:29 PMi gave adguard a try and i am currently using that and working on adguard plugin, the 3rd party repo adguard home plugin doesn't really have a native interface...
Quote from: nero355 on April 16, 2026, 03:14:40 PMTo be honest : People should really avoid needing such a feature!
Is it really that hard to simply check your Pi-Hole Query Log (or the same in AdGuard) and figure out what is being blocked and solve the issue once and for all ?!
Nothing personal by the way. Talking about people in general!
And in the worst case you even have the option to use some kind of DoH/DoT feature in Mozilla Firefox for example to check if your adblocker is the issue at all :)
Quote from: Patrick M. Hausen on April 16, 2026, 12:44:44 PMMay I suggest considering to use AdGuard Home instead for DNS blocking? There are nice mobile apps that let you disable filtering with a single tap - for 1 minute, 5 minutes, 1 hour ... etc.
Quote from: OPNenthu on March 03, 2026, 10:23:09 AMIf they are meant to cascade, is there a way to make the policies work like pf 'quick' rules, on first match? Alternatively, can anyone think of a creative hack to make this scheme work as intended and still support dynamic prefixes? :)
Quote from: adv on January 29, 2026, 01:02:01 AMThanks for the help, everyone. I guess we'll wait and see....
Quote from: mikes91 on January 17, 2026, 02:02:07 AMI use Verizon 5G Home Internet and their XCI55AX cell router. My journey to OPNsense started when I decided I wanted to use Pi-hole but the XCI55AX router will not allow the end user to change the DNS settings, so what I must do is put their router in passthrough mode and use my own router instead.
If anyone has already done this, I would appreciate whatever you are willing to share regarding the appropriate configuration settings. I've gotten as far as installing OPNsense VM on my Proxmox installed mini-pc (a Beelink SER5 Ryzen 7 5825U) and poking around a bit to get oriented.
Any and all advice/pointers will be appreciated.
Quote from: mattlach on April 05, 2024, 06:07:28 AMThis is good info.
I have been running OPNSense as a guest under Proxmox on a small server that has one other VM on it (basic linux install for pihole) but I have found that WireGuard requires WAY more CPU than I expected at gigabit speeds, so I am considering doing away with Proxmox, running OPN Sense bare metal, and moving the pihole VM into bhyve on OPNSense instead to make sure OPNSense can talk straight to the hardware and be more efficient.
In my config the one VM would not be externally exposed, but instead get its own entirely virtual local network on the LAN side of the OPNSense firewall, so I am not terribly concerned about security, but I'll port scan it from the WAN side just to make sure.
I probably won't get around to this right away, but when I do I'll definitely post back here.
Thanks for sharing.
Quote from: darkvoid on December 25, 2025, 03:29:56 PMChipping in from some experience with my setup.
netgraph networking works very well with bhyve.
I use the following script to setup a bridge to link the virtual machine directly to the OPNSense LAN interface:# Setup ng_bridge if required
if ! ngctl status bnet0: >/dev/null 2>&1; then
ngctl -f- <<END
mkpeer igc0: bridge lower link0
name igc0:lower bnet0
connect igc0: bnet0: upper link1
msg igc0: setpromisc 1
msg igc0: setautosrc 0
END
fi
This creates a bridge linked to igc0 (my OPNsense LAN interface) and prepares for bhyve to attach.
bhyve can subsequently attach to the bridge as follows:bhyve \
-c sockets=1,cores=8,threads=1 \
-m 16G \
-s 0,hostbridge \
-s 2,virtio-blk,/vm/hdd.img \
-s 3,virtio-net,netgraph,path=bnet0:,peerhook=link2 \
-s 4,virtio-9p,data=/zdata/vm \
-s 5,virtio-rnd \
-s 31,lpc \
-l bootrom,/vm/BHYVE_UEFI.fd,/vm/efi-vars.fd \
-l com1,stdio \
-u \
-H -P -S \
This has provided very stable and performant networking on the bhyve instance.
Quote from: OPNenthu on January 13, 2026, 08:52:29 PMhttps://github.com/opnsense/core/milestones