https://docs.amnezia.org/documentation/amnezia-wg/
This is even better than regular Wireguard. I'm really looking forward to its support!
Well, it was added and then quickly removed from freebsd:
https://www.freshports.org/net/amneziawg-tools/
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D51265
Not a good start.
Well, they removed it just to rename the whole thing without "wg" in the name.
Port is available:
https://www.freshports.org/net/amnezia-tools/ (https://www.freshports.org/net/amnezia-tools/)
https://www.freshports.org/net/amnezia-kmod/ (https://www.freshports.org/net/amnezia-kmod/)
Can it be supported in OPNsense?
What should be the scope of "supported in OPNsense"?
As soon as a port exists, you are free to pull the port (e.g. from github) and build the binary via "make build".
Do you mean like offering a prebuilt binary via the package manager? Or even a plugin?
The last two things need somebody who makes an effort.
What about: https://github.com/antspopov/opnsense_amnezia_plugin (I am not afflifiated with this repo) ? Does it look complete?
Whats the benefit of such a wireguard implementation, wouldnt it be better to use something protocol agnostic that can tunnel any protocol through a websocket like:
https://github.com/erebe/wstunnel
https://github.com/erebe/wstunnel?tab=readme-ov-file#wireguard-and-wstunnel-
Did you manage to get AmneziaWG plug-in installed and working? Curious to know of it is working well.
Quote from: haemm0r on October 29, 2025, 08:59:48 PMWhat about: https://github.com/antspopov/opnsense_amnezia_plugin (I am not afflifiated with this repo) ? Does it look complete?
Let's hope they implement it.
Wstunnel is fine but no UI is made for it.
We need PRs for this we will not implement this ourselves.