OPNsense Forum

English Forums => Hardware and Performance => Topic started by: Jabes on February 12, 2024, 11:49:52 PM

Title: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: Jabes on February 12, 2024, 11:49:52 PM
Looking at buying a new hardware and moving to Opnsense (I am currently running Untangle).
It looks like an N100 is the right price/performance at the moment - but I need to get 1Gb PPPoE line performance (this is how my internet circle is delivered).

All the new hardware (have been looking at CWWK/HUNSN from ali or amazon) seems to come with i226 which seems to still have some issues? Would I be ok with this hardware?
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: Patrick M. Hausen on February 13, 2024, 07:35:41 AM
A Deciso DEC650 and successors will deliver 1 Gbit/s with PPPoE. That's all I have actually measured, sorry, no idea about the N100.
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: meyergru on February 13, 2024, 08:15:36 AM
Since even the previous generations of N5105 and J4125 suffice in routing 1 GBit/s, the N100 should be able to do that as well. Zenarmor or VPN is another story, though.
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: Patrick M. Hausen on February 13, 2024, 08:35:57 AM
Quote from: meyergru on February 13, 2024, 08:15:36 AM
Since even the previous generations of N5105 and J4125 suffice in routing 1 GBit/s, the N100 should be able to do that as well.
Routing =/= PPPoE  ;)
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: meyergru on February 13, 2024, 09:22:28 AM
I implied with PPPoE, as I use all of these devices with PPPoE.
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: Patrick M. Hausen on February 13, 2024, 09:27:25 AM
Quote from: meyergru on February 13, 2024, 09:22:28 AM
I implied with PPPoE, as I use all of these devices with PPPoE.
Good to know, thanks!
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: planetf1 on February 13, 2024, 10:58:05 AM
Noticed any additional latency with pppoe on opnsense on this kind of hardware due to PPPoE (either bare metal or virtualized) when compared with a typical ISP router (or even a microtik or similar) ?
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: meyergru on February 13, 2024, 12:40:48 PM
I have 4ms ping time with a N6005 using an external ONT, so no.
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: Jabes on February 13, 2024, 01:08:31 PM
Quote from: meyergru on February 13, 2024, 08:15:36 AM
Since even the previous generations of N5105 and J4125 suffice in routing 1 GBit/s, the N100 should be able to do that as well. Zenarmor or VPN is another story, though.
Thank you for this first hand data -- Interested in Zenarmor, less concerned about VPN processing. Is this far off from being able to do 1Gb with PPPoE with these? Or where would I need to go hardware wise?
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: CJ on February 13, 2024, 04:44:48 PM
Quote from: Jabes on February 12, 2024, 11:49:52 PM
Looking at buying a new hardware and moving to Opnsense (I am currently running Untangle).
It looks like an N100 is the right price/performance at the moment - but I need to get 1Gb PPPoE line performance (this is how my internet circle is delivered).

All the new hardware (have been looking at CWWK/HUNSN from ali or amazon) seems to come with i226 which seems to still have some issues? Would I be ok with this hardware?

I can't speak to PPPoE as I don't use it, but i225/i226 is hit or miss.  I've posted a thread to try and isolate the variable since some people have zero problems and others have a lot.  I'm currently using i225 with no issues.
Title: Re: N100 for PPPoE 1Gb?
Post by: meyergru on February 13, 2024, 05:43:44 PM
Quote from: Jabes on February 13, 2024, 01:08:31 PM
Quote from: meyergru on February 13, 2024, 08:15:36 AM
Since even the previous generations of N5105 and J4125 suffice in routing 1 GBit/s, the N100 should be able to do that as well. Zenarmor or VPN is another story, though.
Thank you for this first hand data -- Interested in Zenarmor, less concerned about VPN processing. Is this far off from being able to do 1Gb with PPPoE with these? Or where would I need to go hardware wise?

I do not use zenarmor, so I cannot really tell other than in order to inspect encrypted traffic, it has to be decrypted and encrypted again, so I assume CPU overhead comparable to encryption over a VPN.

Maybe you should ask Zenarmor folks on what CPU they recommend for your requirements.