OPNsense Forum

International Forums => German - Deutsch => Topic started by: micneu on March 30, 2021, 09:10:08 PM

Title: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: micneu on March 30, 2021, 09:10:08 PM
Moin, habe mal wieder eine neue Hardware.







Rechner:Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
CPU:Intel® Core™ i5-1145G7 Processor (8M Cache, up to 4,40 GHz, with IPU)
RAM:2 x Crucial DDR4-3200 16GB SO-DIMM
ETH:Dual Intel® Ethernet Controller i225-LM




Was mich bei dem Rechner am meisten interessiert hat ist die AES Performance, und da bin ich bisher sowas von begeistert.
root@rt:~ # openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-256-cbc
You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 16 size blocks: 2147483647 aes-256-cbc's in 2.73s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 949352368 aes-256-cbc's in 3.02s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 108571095 aes-256-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 27283440 aes-256-cbc's in 3.01s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 3404923 aes-256-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 1753082 aes-256-cbc's in 3.09s
OpenSSL 1.1.1d-freebsd  10 Sep 2019
built on: reproducible build, date unspecified
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(ptr)
compiler: clang
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
aes-256-cbc   12565847.17k 20147913.47k  9264733.44k  9288558.57k  9297709.74k  9284038.95k
root@rt:~ # openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-256-gcm
You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 16 size blocks: 1813578232 aes-256-gcm's in 3.06s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1141754627 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 256 size blocks: 661257838 aes-256-gcm's in 3.05s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 219639263 aes-256-gcm's in 3.01s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 33312238 aes-256-gcm's in 3.01s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 16918974 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
OpenSSL 1.1.1d-freebsd  10 Sep 2019
built on: reproducible build, date unspecified
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(ptr)
compiler: clang
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
aes-256-gcm    9475020.97k 24357432.04k 55417127.46k 74775473.97k 90728346.16k 92400156.67k

Fazit:
Auch wenn die Ethernet Schnittstellen noch nicht unterstütz werden, ich werde die Hardware behalten, im Notfall muss halt ein Ubuntu drauf (da werden die Schnittstellen unterstützt)

Title: Re: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: micneu on March 30, 2021, 09:11:13 PM
und hier meine Frage, wie kann ich die Netzwerktreiber installieren/nachladen oder wo kann ich am besten bitten das die treiber mit aufgenommen werden?
Title: Re: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: lfirewall1243 on March 30, 2021, 09:40:47 PM
Offiziell scheint es keinen zu geben
Für pfsense aber wohl

https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/jfppad/intel_i225lm/
Title: Re: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: chemlud on March 30, 2021, 09:59:04 PM
Hmmm, open source?

https://forum.netgate.com/topic/159994/intel-ethernet-controller-i225-lm-support

Aber im Ernst: 500.- Euro ohne RAM, SSD, Netzteil? Wow...
Title: Re: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: micneu on March 31, 2021, 07:48:06 AM
für mich ist der preis ok, hatte schon andere systeme die ohne ram usw. um die 1000€ gekostet haben und nicht so performant waren.
Title: Re: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: lfirewall1243 on March 31, 2021, 08:13:47 AM
Quote from: micneu on March 31, 2021, 07:48:06 AM
für mich ist der preis ok, hatte schon andere systeme die ohne ram usw. um die 1000€ gekostet haben und nicht so performant waren.
Wenn jetzt nur die Netzwerkkarte laufen würde  ;D
Title: Re: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: chemlud on March 31, 2021, 08:57:41 AM
Quote from: micneu on March 31, 2021, 07:48:06 AM
für mich ist der preis ok, hatte schon andere systeme die ohne ram usw. um die 1000€ gekostet haben und nicht so performant waren.

Joooo, ich mach' auch Büroarbeit auf (alten) Workstations, aber die Kosten als Leasingrückläufer das, was du für eine "Firewall" mit 2 Interfaces ausgibst... ;-)

Intel ist 1. Hand ziemlich (über)teuer(ert) imho...
Title: Re: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: micneu on March 31, 2021, 09:43:16 AM
übrigens der aes test unter opnsense hat dann doch recht komische werte ausgespuckt, hier noch mal die von einem ubuntu 20.04
root@rt4:~# openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-256-cbc
You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 16 size blocks: 205747041 aes-256-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 71464250 aes-256-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 18179572 aes-256-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 4564762 aes-256-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 571296 aes-256-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-cbc for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 285690 aes-256-cbc's in 3.00s
OpenSSL 1.1.1f  31 Mar 2020
built on: Mon Mar 22 11:37:17 2021 UTC
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) blowfish(ptr)
compiler: gcc -fPIC -pthread -m64 -Wa,--noexecstack -Wall -Wa,--noexecstack -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/openssl-Juj39H/openssl-1.1.1f=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -DOPENSSL_TLS_SECURITY_LEVEL=2 -DOPENSSL_USE_NODELETE -DL_ENDIAN -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DKECCAK1600_ASM -DRC4_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAESNI_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DX25519_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -DNDEBUG -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
aes-256-cbc    1097317.55k  1524570.67k  1551323.48k  1558105.43k  1560018.94k  1560248.32k
root@rt4:~# openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-256-gcm
You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 16 size blocks: 149232198 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 64 size blocks: 94441880 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 256 size blocks: 49488468 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 17097267 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 2522013 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 1281328 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
OpenSSL 1.1.1f  31 Mar 2020
built on: Mon Mar 22 11:37:17 2021 UTC
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) blowfish(ptr)
compiler: gcc -fPIC -pthread -m64 -Wa,--noexecstack -Wall -Wa,--noexecstack -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/openssl-Juj39H/openssl-1.1.1f=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -DOPENSSL_TLS_SECURITY_LEVEL=2 -DOPENSSL_USE_NODELETE -DL_ENDIAN -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DKECCAK1600_ASM -DRC4_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAESNI_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DX25519_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -DNDEBUG -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
aes-256-gcm     795905.06k  2014760.11k  4223015.94k  5835867.14k  6886776.83k  6997759.32k

alles etwas realistischer
Title: Re: Intel® NUC 11 Pro Kit NUC11TNHv50L
Post by: chemlud on March 31, 2021, 10:01:31 AM
Hmmm, aber was passiert da bei dem Test unter der sense? :-O